Re: [OSM-talk] Formal proposal: mechanically reverting fixme=set␣better␣denotation / denotation=cluster

2015-03-02 Thread moltonel 3x Combo
On 01/03/2015, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
 This is now a formal proposal to mechanically remove:

 denotation=cluster
 fixme=set␣better␣denotation


 From 200,000+ nodes.  See
 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Bryce_C_Nesbitt

I agree with deleting the fixme tag.

Concering the deletion of the denotation tag, on the one hand I agree because
 + its meaning is not obvious, and it doesn't seem to play well with
other denotation values
 + the same information can be obtained from a spatial query.

however:
 - there are ~20K uses of denotation=cluster that aren't associated
with the fixme, and therefore seemingly not done by the automated
edit. Please either delete all denotation=cluster tags regardless of
their origin, or explain why the cases are different.
 - The other most-common denotation values (urban and avenue) suffer
from the same issues. It would seem that *if* cluster is to be
deleted, urban and avenue ought to suffer the same fate.

I'm saying all this without having read the old discussions on the
topic; sorry if I'm beating a dead horse.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] Formal proposal: mechanically reverting fixme=set␣better␣denotation / denotation=cluster

2015-03-01 Thread Matthijs Melissen
On 1 March 2015 at 21:04, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
 This is now a formal proposal to mechanically remove:

 denotation=cluster
 fixme=set␣better␣denotation


 From 200,000+ nodes.  See
 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Bryce_C_Nesbitt


I support this proposal.

-- Matthijs

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk