Yep, that seems to have a few advantages over the other order cheers
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:32 PM, BlueMM <bluemm1975-...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Franc Carter <franc.car...@...> writes: > > Hi,It looks like the vote is in favour of relations and there is the > > beginnings of consensus around other tags.So I have updated the wiki page > [SNIP] > > Hey, crazy idea, but should we be using something like au.gov.abs:xyz as > the > "namespace"? > It matches the Java library format, and would group tags really well when > sorted > alphabetically. > I wanted to suggest it before our first major import as trying to change a > notation later on would suck big time. I could see future imports following > a > similar format, like au.gov.vic.land, au.com.whereis etc. > Or maybe just use the above suggestion when there will be ambiguity like > the ABS > case. I can imagine being consistent would make sorted tags match up very > nicely > (like in Tagwatch or Potlatch if/when its tags are displayed sorted - I > don't > think they are yet but the TIGER guys wanted it) > > Thoughts? > > BlueMM > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > -- Franc
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
