Re: [talk-au] Manipulating ABS suburb data, and related data..
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Franc Carter wrote: > Hmm, one thing that I forgot to check is the number of nodes in the ways - > I seem to remember that 0.6 was going to introduce a limit on this . . . . > > cheers The limit is 2000, and the involved way 1,400 or so, but it might be a clue; if i break the really big ones in the middle they might save -- Accidents cause History. If Sigismund Unbuckle had taken a walk in 1426 and met Wat Tyler, the Peasant's Revolt would never have happened and the motor car would not have been invented until 2026, which would have meant that all the oil could have been used for lamps, thus saving the electric light bulb and the whale, and nobody would have caught Moby Dick or Billy Budd. -- Mike Harding, "The Armchair Anarchist's Almanac" ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] Manipulating ABS suburb data, and related data..
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Liz wrote: > On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Franc Carter wrote: > > I'm currently wrestling with trying to get a handle on how we can tell > > whether the ABS data is more geographically > > accurate than yahoo or other data (not necessairly whether it is an > > accuate reflection of the boundaries) > > > > So, yes - thoughts please > > ABS is more accurate is more accurate than my river tracing. > I don't foresee me taking to canoeing down the rivers for a really accurate > trace either. > I'm hoping that some of the Lachlan has been used for ABS boundaries to > replace some of my extremely rough and ready tracing there. > > Struck a problem, in that new API chokes on trying to split some of these ways. I've logged the problem in trac, but still disappointed as very few of my river edits have been successful in upload. ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
