Re: [talk-au] bus_stop further details

2009-09-07 Thread Franc Carter
I agree, sounds sensible

cheers

On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Roy Wallace  wrote:

> Gday,
>
> For tagging highway=bus_stop 's, in addition to the existing
> shelter=yes/no, I'm planning to also use bench=yes/no and
> waste_basket=yes/no, as these features are often installed as part of the
> bus stop itself, in Brisbane.
>
> Tagging separate nodes with amenity=* is not ideal, as 1) i couldn't really
> be bothered and, more importantly, 2) they are physically part of the bus
> stop (e.g. bench built into the bus_stop shelter; waste_basket bolted to the
> bus_stop sign) and therefore additional nodes are not even semantically more
> correct.
>
> Any comments/support/reprimands?
>
> Cheers,
> Roy
>
> ___
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
>


-- 
Franc
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


[talk-au] bus_stop further details

2009-09-07 Thread Roy Wallace
Gday,

For tagging highway=bus_stop 's, in addition to the existing shelter=yes/no,
I'm planning to also use bench=yes/no and waste_basket=yes/no, as these
features are often installed as part of the bus stop itself, in Brisbane.

Tagging separate nodes with amenity=* is not ideal, as 1) i couldn't really
be bothered and, more importantly, 2) they are physically part of the bus
stop (e.g. bench built into the bus_stop shelter; waste_basket bolted to the
bus_stop sign) and therefore additional nodes are not even semantically more
correct.

Any comments/support/reprimands?

Cheers,
Roy
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au