You could use protection_title=Conservation park
Usefull additional keys key value discription <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:protection_title&action =edit&redlink=1> protection_title= wildlife sanctuary, Zapovedniki, Nationalpark, Special Protected Area, World Heritage Convention, Aesthetic Forest, Heritage River, Indian Reserve, ... Title or type of protection. The national destination, the formal title or type of protection (see level-table). Important! You should give this. To make differences within one level. At the end it gives too a sample of terms. Put the proper name as key-value. The individual labeling, f.e. like the phillipine "Nipas Category". Markus -----Original Message----- From: Roy Wallace [mailto:waldo000...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 30 June 2010 7:19 AM To: James Livingston Cc: Markus; OSM Australian Talk List Subject: Re: [talk-au] Queensland parks, forests and conservation areas On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:49 PM, James Livingston <li...@sunsetutopia.com> wrote: > > Here's what I've currently got, any more comments? > ... Is it worth using an additional classification:qld=national_park|conservation_park|state_forest, etc. (or similar), just to make things extra clear? That is, when you use a rule like "Conservation Parks get boundary=protected_area", I think it would be nice to also record that they are a conservation_park.
No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.830 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2969 - Release Date: 06/29/10 04:05:00
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
