Re: [talk-au] Transponders mistagged
On 22 April 2011 13:43, Elizabeth Dodd wrote: > The logical reason for a relation is that there are numerous parts to > the transponders at various heights and that there are several per > aerial mast / comms hut > Perhaps the wiki page needs a rewrite? I thought the wiki page was added to about the time that data was added, but Elizabeth is correct about multiple transponders per location. ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] Transponders mistagged
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:31:22 +1000 Gary Gallagher wrote: > Hi, >I've been editing some areas of rural Victoria and I keep coming > across communications transponders that have been mis-tagged as > relations. in the .osm file the xml looks like this:- > >timestamp='2010-05-22T23:46:04Z' uid='74617' user='JohnSmith' > visible='true' version='2' changeset='4779256'> > > > > v='http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/pc=PC_9150' /> > v='directional' /> v='744.25' /> v='PAL' /> v='horizontal' /> v='1000' /> > > > > > I'm not sure about some of the tags but from what I can figure out > from the transponder proposal at > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Communications_Transponder > the should be v='communications_transponder' /> and the whole thing should be a > node and not a relation. I could perhaps write an xsl script to clean > up the individual .osm files I use but this mis-tag is all over the > state, and perhaps Australia. Is there someone who knows how to do a > more systemic clean up. > > cheers >Gary The logical reason for a relation is that there are numerous parts to the transponders at various heights and that there are several per aerial mast / comms hut Perhaps the wiki page needs a rewrite? ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
[talk-au] Transponders mistagged
Hi, I've been editing some areas of rural Victoria and I keep coming across communications transponders that have been mis-tagged as relations. in the .osm file the xml looks like this:- I'm not sure about some of the tags but from what I can figure out from the transponder proposal at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Communications_Transponder the should be and the whole thing should be a node and not a relation. I could perhaps write an xsl script to clean up the individual .osm files I use but this mis-tag is all over the state, and perhaps Australia. Is there someone who knows how to do a more systemic clean up. cheers Gary ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] Reverting a bad edit?
On 21 April 2011 05:05, 4x4falcon wrote: > Completed. > > Please check the area as I don't know what should be there. > This isn't the only large scale delete by new user within minutes of signing up. Recent example in the UK: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7907122 Best we keep a look out :) / Grant ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
