Re: [talk-au] Redaction recovery

2012-07-30 Thread waldo000...@gmail.com
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Ben Kelley ben.kel...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi.

 For the moment the cycle map still has the pre redacted data, which will
 give some tips.

 snip

Could you clarify what you mean by give some tips, please? This is a
sensitive issue, right?
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Redaction recovery

2012-07-30 Thread Barker, Nicholas
I suggested this (as 'legal stuff' is not my strong point) and was promptly 
told it's a big no-no!

I think we have to forget that data ever existed (which is somewhat sad but ah 
well onwards and upwards with the mapping eh)

From: waldo000...@gmail.com [mailto:waldo000...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 30 July 2012 4:13 PM
To: Ben Kelley
Cc: OSM - Talk-au
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Redaction recovery

On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Ben Kelley 
ben.kel...@gmail.commailto:ben.kel...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi.

For the moment the cycle map still has the pre redacted data, which will give 
some tips.

snip
Could you clarify what you mean by give some tips, please? This is a 
sensitive issue, right?

__
NOTICE: This communication and any attachments (this message) may contain 
confidential information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any 
unauthorized use, disclosure, viewing, copying, alteration, dissemination or 
distribution of, or reliance on this message is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this message in error, or you are not an authorized recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message, delete this 
message and all copies from your e-mail system and destroy any printed copies.___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


[talk-au] Marrickville Cycle Routes (Was: Re: Redaction recovery)

2012-07-30 Thread Ian Sergeant
On 30 July 2012 16:18, Barker, Nicholas nbar...@pb.com.au wrote:

  ** **

 I think we have to forget that data ever existed (which is somewhat sad
 but ah well onwards and upwards with the mapping eh)




Agreed.

On the subject of Marrickville cycle routes, I know they were one of the
only councils in Sydney with nicely numbered routes from point to point.
However, the route numbers have gone off their web page.  The few route
numbers that remain around the LGA are in disrepair, and most have gone.

Do we want to remap Marrickville using what I think is now an outdated
route numbering scheme, or bring the mapping inline with the rest of Sydney.

Ian.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Redaction recovery

2012-07-30 Thread Ben Kelley
Hi.

I meant it will give you an idea of where to start looking (so you can
confirm by survey or aerial photo). Same goes for looking at council
published maps.

I wasn't suggesting people copy the data. We need to be very careful about
this.

  - Ben Kelley.
On Jul 30, 2012 4:13 PM, waldo000...@gmail.com waldo000...@gmail.com
wrote:

 On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Ben Kelley ben.kel...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi.

 For the moment the cycle map still has the pre redacted data, which will
 give some tips.

 snip

 Could you clarify what you mean by give some tips, please? This is a
 sensitive issue, right?

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


[talk-au] Great checking/fixing progress

2012-07-30 Thread Ben Johnson
I'm amazed at the progress being made in some regions as per the task  
manager at http://rebuild.poole.ch/


Brisbane-Gold Coast - http://rebuild.poole.ch/job/29  (10% checked /  
fixed)


Sydney Basin - http://rebuild.poole.ch/job/8  (27% checked / fixed)

Sydney-Newcastle coastal strip - http://rebuild.poole.ch/job/9  (83%  
checked / fixed)



We are going to need a few validators.

BJ


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Marrickville Cycle Routes (Was: Re: Redaction recovery)

2012-07-30 Thread Sam Russell
Ian wrote,
 On the subject of Marrickville cycle routes, I know they were one of the
 only councils in Sydney with nicely numbered routes from point to point.
 However, the route numbers have gone off their web page.  The few route
 numbers that remain around the LGA are in disrepair, and most have gone.

 Do we want to remap Marrickville using what I think is now an outdated
 route numbering scheme, or bring the mapping inline with the rest of
Sydney.

Where route numbers are in repair or in repair but separated by clear
intervening route signs, keep the route ref and name.
Where route numbers are in disrepair copy key:ref=L# to key:old_ref=L#?

My Saturday ride is unplanned right now, I'm happy to go chasing routing
and route identity signs in Marrickville.

yours,
Sam R.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Marrickville Cycle Routes (Was: Re: Redaction recovery)

2012-07-30 Thread Ben Kelley
I emailed the Bike Marrickville list, and the consensus seems to be to keep
them where they are signposted.

Still waiting on a response from someone on the council as to what their
future strategy on signage is. I have seen internal documents using these
references, as well as RRxx for regional routes (which don't appear on
signs).

It's been so long since I surveyed these that I'm not sure how much help I
can give. I am pretty sure these have signs: L2 (although possibly confused
with L5 in places), L4, L5 (with alternate sections where I used L5a), L7,
L10, L11 and L13. Arguably a lot of L8 has no signs at all.

  - Ben.
On Jul 31, 2012 12:12 PM, Sam Russell g.samuelruss...@gmail.com wrote:

 Ian wrote,
  On the subject of Marrickville cycle routes, I know they were one of the
  only councils in Sydney with nicely numbered routes from point to point.
  However, the route numbers have gone off their web page.  The few route
  numbers that remain around the LGA are in disrepair, and most have gone.

  Do we want to remap Marrickville using what I think is now an outdated
  route numbering scheme, or bring the mapping inline with the rest of
 Sydney.

 Where route numbers are in repair or in repair but separated by clear
 intervening route signs, keep the route ref and name.
 Where route numbers are in disrepair copy key:ref=L# to key:old_ref=L#?

 My Saturday ride is unplanned right now, I'm happy to go chasing routing
 and route identity signs in Marrickville.

 yours,
 Sam R.

 ___
 Talk-au mailing list
 Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Great checking/fixing progress

2012-07-30 Thread waldo000...@gmail.com
Hey, I'll be back in the country in August, looking forward to helping out
in Brisbane. Nice job so far :-)

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Ben Johnson tangarar...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'm amazed at the progress being made in some regions as per the task
 manager at http://rebuild.poole.ch/

 Brisbane-Gold Coast - http://rebuild.poole.ch/job/29  (10% checked /
 fixed)

 Sydney Basin - http://rebuild.poole.ch/job/8  (27% checked / fixed)

 Sydney-Newcastle coastal strip - http://rebuild.poole.ch/job/9  (83%
 checked / fixed)


 We are going to need a few validators.

 BJ


 __**_
 Talk-au mailing list
 Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-auhttp://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au