[talk-au] Adding only part of a road to a route relation (was: network and route tags)

2013-02-03 Thread SomeoneElse 

On 03/02/2013 12:22, David Clark wrote:
ie I have a route (The Mawson trail) that passes along a section of a 
fire road, but it doesn't pass along the full length of the fire road. 
How do a I select only a section of the fire road (not the full length 
of it) so I can make the relationship to the route?




You'd need to cut the fire road into 2 (or perhaps 3) and then add the 
relation to only the relevant bit.  In Potlatch (the online editor on 
the OSM website) you can do this by clicking on the node that you want 
to split it at and pressing "x".


Here's an example (not in Australia, but the same principle applies):

http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=53.13304&lon=-1.78357&zoom=16&layers=C

Here "Highfield Lane" is split into two.  The eastern part is added to 
the relation for cycle route 54; the western part isn't.


Cheers,
Andy

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] network and route tags

2013-02-03 Thread David Clark 
I was looking at Opencyclemap rather than mapnik, but the data has
updated now and the mtb trails look different to the cycle paths so
it's all good for me I think.

Now I'm trying to work out how to include a section of a way in a
route.

ie I have a route (The Mawson trail) that passes along a section of a
fire road, but it doesn't pass along the full length of the fire road.
How do a I select only a section of the fire road (not the full length
of it) so I can make the relationship to the route?

Sorry for the scope creep of my original post.

David

- Original message -
From: "Barker, Nicholas" <[1]nbar...@pb.com.au>
To: "Barker, Nicholas" <[2]nbar...@pb.com.au>
Cc: "[3]dbcl...@fastmail.com.au" <[4]dbcl...@fastmail.com.au>,
"talk-au" <[5]talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [talk-au] network and route tags
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 09:40:12 +

Updates on opencyclemap have been vastly improved I've noticed. In line
with the normal map updates more or less*

Sent from my iPhone

On 31/01/2013, at 10:38 PM, "Steve Bennett" <[6]stevag...@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 9:33 PM, David Clark
<[7]dbcl...@fastmail.com.au> wrote:

Ok I've changed route=mtb to mtb=yes for the trail itself. That fixes
the

issue I had with the route side of this so that's great.



Using this approach an mtb trail (singletrack) looks the same as a
cycle

path (paved commuter path). Is this correct?



Looks the same in what? Mapnik? I'm not sure - mapnik may treat

"highway=path; bicycle=yes" as equivalent to "highway=cycleway".

They'll probably look different in opencyclemap, if and when that ever

gets updated again.



Steve



___

Talk-au mailing list

[8]Talk-au@openstreetmap.org

[9]http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


__
NOTICE: This communication and any attachments ("this message") may
contain confidential information for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s). Any unauthorized use, disclosure, viewing, copying,
alteration, dissemination or distribution of, or reliance on this
message
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, or
you are not an authorized recipient, please notify the sender
immediately
by replying to this message, delete this message and all copies from
your
e-mail system and destroy any printed copies.

References

1. mailto:nbar...@pb.com.au
2. mailto:nbar...@pb.com.au
3. mailto:dbcl...@fastmail.com.au
4. mailto:dbcl...@fastmail.com.au
5. mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org
6. mailto:stevag...@gmail.com
7. mailto:dbcl...@fastmail.com.au
8. mailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
9. http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] network and route tags

2013-02-03 Thread Barker, Nicholas 
Updates on opencyclemap have been vastly improved I've noticed. In line with 
the normal map updates more or less*

Sent from my iPhone

On 31/01/2013, at 10:38 PM, "Steve Bennett"  wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 9:33 PM, David Clark  wrote:
>> Ok I've changed route=mtb to mtb=yes for the trail itself. That fixes the
>> issue I had with the route side of this so that's great.
>> 
>> Using this approach an mtb trail (singletrack) looks the same as a cycle
>> path (paved commuter path). Is this correct?
> 
> Looks the same in what? Mapnik? I'm not sure - mapnik may treat
> "highway=path; bicycle=yes" as equivalent to "highway=cycleway".
> They'll probably look different in opencyclemap, if and when that ever
> gets updated again.
> 
> Steve
> 
> ___
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

__
NOTICE: This communication and any attachments ("this message") may contain 
confidential information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any 
unauthorized use, disclosure, viewing, copying, alteration, dissemination or 
distribution of, or reliance on this message is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this message in error, or you are not an authorized recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message, delete this 
message and all copies from your e-mail system and destroy any printed copies.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au