Re: [talk-au] Damage to Maps

[Mark Pulley]

OK. I've just run the reverter plugin on this changeset. Here's my changeset:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/19758081

On 02/01/2014, at 5:05 PM, Jason Ward wrote:
> My understanding is that the whole changeset must be reverted.
> 
> No response from the user yet but if this is a clear mistake then the 
> changeset should be rolled back.
> 
> Cheers, 
> 
> Jason
> On 2 Jan 2014 16:02, "Mark Pulley"  wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Jason Ward :
> >
> >> This appears to be the changeset (done in the Web interface).  I have
> >> messages the person and let them know that a rollback of that will soon
> >> occur.
> >>
> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/19743866
> >>
> >> Please go ahead and do that Peter.
> >
> >
> > Do we need to revert the entire changeset, or just undelete the ways for 
> > the national park and Hawkesbury River? A brief glance at the other ways in 
> > the changeset look OK.
> >
> > Mark P.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Talk-au mailing list
> > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
> ___
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Mark P.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Map damage in Mackay - Mackay mapper

[Jason Ward]

Hi Tim,

If you have a changeset, user name or a suburb available that will help
with finding the problem.

Until then its difficult to kick off any investigation.

Cheers,

Jason
On 2 Jan 2014 16:32, "Timothy Ney"  wrote:

> Damage to data in some Mackay suburbs.   A user has been editing large
> amounts of landuse information in the Mackay northern beaches area.  At
> least two suburbs were completely damaged.  The editing does not seem to be
> for any reason. I don't have the ability to check the user at the moment.
> Could some one let them know to cut it out.  I have many hours into
> sourcing the correct data.
> On 02/01/2014 4:02 PM,  wrote:
>
>> Send Talk-au mailing list submissions to
>> talk-au@openstreetmap.org
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> talk-au-ow...@openstreetmap.org
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of Talk-au digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>1. Damage to Maps (Peter Watson)
>>2. Re: Damage to Maps (Ben Kelley)
>>3. Re: Damage to Maps (Peter Watson)
>>4. Re: Damage to Maps (Jason Ward)
>>5. Re: Damage to Maps (Jason Ward)
>>6. Fwd:  Damage to Maps (Peter Watson)
>>7. Fwd:  Damage to Maps (Peter Watson)
>>8. Re: Damage to Maps (Mark Pulley)
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 12:55:11 +1000
>> From: Peter Watson 
>> To: Open Street Map au Forum 
>> Subject: [talk-au] Damage to Maps
>> Message-ID:
>> > qadddt5...@mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> A new user has removed some large amount of shore line in the Hawkesbury
>> River Brooklyn area. The Hawkesbury River and Ku-ring-gai Chase National
>> Park relations are now broken. There is a lot of white now appearing. The
>> whole change set probably needs to be reverted.
>>
>> Peter W34
>> -- next part --
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20140102/7298a365/attachment-0001.html
>> >
>>
>> --
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 13:59:40 +1100
>> From: Ben Kelley 
>> To: Peter Watson 
>> Cc: Open Street Map au Forum 
>> Subject: Re: [talk-au] Damage to Maps
>> Message-ID:
>> > lwyj5zof-gw3j-u31y+fmsnmystlx...@mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I don't have access to a real computer at the moment, but the revert
>> plugin
>> in JOSM is pretty easy to use.
>>
>> Do you know the change set number? Perhaps someone else can assist.
>>
>> Have you contacted the person?
>>
>> Note that once someone starts manually fixing up a bad edit, it gets
>> harder
>> to revert.
>>
>>- Ben Kelley
>> On 2 Jan 2014 13:56, "Peter Watson"  wrote:
>>
>> > A new user has removed some large amount of shore line in the Hawkesbury
>> > River Brooklyn area. The Hawkesbury River and Ku-ring-gai Chase National
>> > Park relations are now broken. There is a lot of white now appearing.
>> The
>> > whole change set probably needs to be reverted.
>> >
>> > Peter W34
>> >
>> >
>> > ___
>> > Talk-au mailing list
>> > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>> >
>> >
>> -- next part --
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20140102/b24be035/attachment-0001.html
>> >
>>
>> --
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 14:23:00 +1000
>> From: Peter Watson 
>> To: Ben Kelley 
>> Cc: Open Street Map au Forum 
>> Subject: Re: [talk-au] Damage to Maps
>> Message-ID:
>> > xgre+_y91wxuddxzzjf+fc9qn1poum...@mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=&q

[talk-au] Mapping Gallipoli

[Warin]

Hi,

I've taken the trouble of mapping the present memorials (and their 
associated roads, paths .. in some cases adjacent paths so people don't 
take the wrong ones) at Gallipoli, Turkey. A few were maped in the south 
(mainly British, about 4), one road was GPS sourced. I've tried to get 
them all (OZ, NZ and Turkish mainly), there maybe a few left (at least 2 
I think) but I've not found them with bing.


The Question?
Should I now map the named ridges, gullies etc that were used by 'us' 
(and/or named by 'us') in the action? I'd be using info from the 
official Australian history (avalible as pdfs ... and that has copyright 
exclusions under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 
Australia (CC BY-NC 3.0 AU) license 
. Oh ... rats ... no 
it doesn't - on another page  "The Australian War Memorial holds 
copyright for the text, maps and photographs contained in the Official 
Histories. Reproduction is allowed for private use only. For commercial 
reproduction, the permission of the Memorial must be obtained."

So that is 2 questions .. or 3


 Should it be mapped?  (I'm looking at chapter 24 page 546/7 if your 
intrested. link http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/first_world_war/ think 
you'd want volume 2)

Would the turks object? I should ask them ..
 Getting permission from the Australian War Memorial?


PS ..
I'm now dowloading the 'Gallipoli Mission'.. I've had the WW1 history 
for some time .. and yes I've read it ..


http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/first_world_war/AWMOHWW1/Supplementary/GallipoliMission/ 

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Mapping Gallipoli

[Michael Collinson]

Hi Warin,

First,  wonderful idea,  my grandad fought there with the 2nd AIF and being 
able to relate dry names in books to actual places is very satisfying ... 
whether just looking at the map or making an actual visit.

I think it well worth approaching Australian War Memorial. As OpenStreetMap can 
be used by commercial entities we cannot use NC licensed data. But as we 
ourselves are non-commercial and you are trying to do something for common good 
without reward, you may well get a sympathetic response. In a similar vein, I 
was able to get permission from the Smithsonian to add volcanos from their 
global index. 

I also agree that asking the Turkish community shows tact and courtesy and will 
perpetuate the regard that the fighting men of both sides had for each other. I 
suggest using name:en so that Turkish names can be used as default.

Best wishes for 2014 to all Australian mappers,
Mike

 Original message 
From Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> 
Date: 2014/01/02  21:29  (GMT-05:00) 
To talk-au@openstreetmap.org 
Subject [talk-au] Mapping Gallipoli 
 
Hi,

I've taken the trouble of mapping the present memorials (and their associated 
roads, paths .. in some cases adjacent paths so people don't take the wrong 
ones) at Gallipoli, Turkey. A few were maped in the south (mainly British, 
about 4), one road was GPS sourced. I've tried to get them all (OZ, NZ and 
Turkish mainly), there maybe a few left (at least 2 I think) but I've not found 
them with bing. 

The Question? 
Should I now map the named ridges, gullies etc that were used by 'us' (and/or 
named by 'us') in the action? I'd be using info from the official Australian 
history (avalible as pdfs ... and that has copyright exclusions under Creative 
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Australia (CC BY-NC 3.0 AU) license. Oh 
... rats ... no it doesn't - on another page  "The Australian War Memorial 
holds copyright for the text, maps and photographs contained in the Official 
Histories. Reproduction is allowed for private use only. For commercial 
reproduction, the permission of the Memorial must be obtained." 
So that is 2 questions .. or 3 


 Should it be mapped?  (I'm looking at chapter 24 page 546/7 if your intrested. 
link http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/first_world_war/ think you'd want volume 
2) 
Would the turks object? I should ask them .. 
 Getting permission from the Australian War Memorial? 


PS ..
I'm now dowloading the 'Gallipoli Mission'.. I've had the WW1 history for some 
time .. and yes I've read it .. 

http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/first_world_war/AWMOHWW1/Supplementary/GallipoliMission/
 
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au