Re: [talk-au] Local Government Areas without Councils

[Andrew Harvey]

I agree that since the area is commonly known and and referred to as
"Unincorporated Area of Far West NSW" so should be mapped in OSM and with
that name. The other name tags

In my opinion this area should be tagged as admin_level=6 since it acts and
feels like other Shires, Councils, etc. Even if those Local Government
services are administered by some other entity I don't think that matters.
The operator tag can be set as Department of Industry or NSW Government,
etc.

On 5 January 2017 at 12:11, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 03-Jan-17 04:15 PM, Andrew Davidson wrote:
>
>> On 3/1/17 13:24, Warin wrote:
>>
>> Near as I can figure .. your joking.
>>>
>>
>> No I'm being serious. Your proposal is to use level 6 to map the entity
>> "that performs the function of a 'local government authority'". In the case
>> of the western part of NSW this is the New South Wales Government.
>>
>> That said , and example would be the name used for nsw western bit
>>> name = Unincorporated Area of Western NSW could be appropriate
>>>
>>
>> No, that would be a description. There is no entity called
>> "Unincorporated Area of Western NSW".
>>
>
> It is a name.
> Another sample ..
> https://digitalfarwestnsw.com.au/government-services/the-uni
> ncorporated-area-of-far-west-nsw-2/ "Unincorporated Area of Far West NSW"
>
>
>
>> ... run
>>> by the Western Lands Commission - part of the NSW Dept of
>>> Environment ?
>>>
>>
>> That's still a description and also not correct.
>>
>
> Ok on the Dept/Commission thing.. must be a historic thing .. found on the
> web.
>
> This http://www.crownland.nsw.gov.au/crown_lands/western_region
> says "In these areas, which include the villages of Silverton, Tibooburra,
> and Milparinka, the Department of Industry - Lands (the Department) assists
> in co-ordinating various community services."
> I do wonder if that is current ... copyright says 2010.
>
> So rather than the whole NSW Government .. it could be the NSW Department
> of Industry - Lands.
>
> 
> Some names are descriptive, and we are the better for it. Tibooburra for
> instance.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Areas without Councils

[Warin]

On 03-Jan-17 04:15 PM, Andrew Davidson wrote:

On 3/1/17 13:24, Warin wrote:


Near as I can figure .. your joking.


No I'm being serious. Your proposal is to use level 6 to map the 
entity "that performs the function of a 'local government authority'". 
In the case of the western part of NSW this is the New South Wales 
Government.



That said , and example would be the name used for nsw western bit
name = Unincorporated Area of Western NSW could be appropriate


No, that would be a description. There is no entity called 
"Unincorporated Area of Western NSW".


It is a name.
Another sample ..
https://digitalfarwestnsw.com.au/government-services/the-unincorporated-area-of-far-west-nsw-2/ 
"Unincorporated Area of Far West NSW"






... run
by the Western Lands Commission - part of the NSW Dept of 
Environment ?


That's still a description and also not correct.


Ok on the Dept/Commission thing.. must be a historic thing .. found on 
the web.


This http://www.crownland.nsw.gov.au/crown_lands/western_region
says "In these areas, which include the villages of Silverton, 
Tibooburra, and Milparinka, the Department of Industry - Lands (the 
Department) assists in co-ordinating various community services."

I do wonder if that is current ... copyright says 2010.

So rather than the whole NSW Government .. it could be the NSW 
Department of Industry - Lands.



Some names are descriptive, and we are the better for it. Tibooburra for 
instance.









___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au