Re: [talk-au] Stormwater drains
The only maps I can see are http://www.hurstville.nsw.gov.au/Hurstville-City-Maps.html and correct, no sign of any authority to use the data I also wouldn't change any flows at this stage as there could be pump stations within the system that alter what looks like correct flows. -Original Message- From: fors...@ozonline.com.au [mailto:fors...@ozonline.com.au] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 11:24 AM To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: [talk-au] Stormwater drains Hi User Spookylad https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Spookylad appears to be mapping the underground stormwater drainage system tagging as drain or culvert. Some changes cite "Source: Hurstville City Council Drain Map" but give no information on copyright. They have not responded to my comments suggesting they would be better as man_made=pipeline location=underground. Am I justified in retagging as man_made=pipeline location=underground? What to do with Way: 489841972 which seems from the imagery like a pit cover about 30cm off the ground? man_made=yes surface=concrete? Is it reasonable to change some directions so flow is to the south? Thanks Tony ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] Stormwater drains
You could contact the Data Working Group to put in place a ban until they read a message asking them to respond about importing copyrighted data. On 11 May 2017 11:24 AM, wrote: > Hi > > User Spookylad https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Spookylad appears to be > mapping the underground stormwater drainage system tagging as drain or > culvert. Some changes cite "Source: Hurstville City Council Drain Map" but > give no information on copyright. > > They have not responded to my comments suggesting they would be better as > man_made=pipeline location=underground. > > Am I justified in retagging as man_made=pipeline location=underground? > > What to do with Way: 489841972 which seems from the imagery like a pit > cover about 30cm off the ground? man_made=yes surface=concrete? > > Is it reasonable to change some directions so flow is to the south? > > Thanks > Tony > > > > > > > > > ___ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
[talk-au] Stormwater drains
Hi User Spookylad https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Spookylad appears to be mapping the underground stormwater drainage system tagging as drain or culvert. Some changes cite "Source: Hurstville City Council Drain Map" but give no information on copyright. They have not responded to my comments suggesting they would be better as man_made=pipeline location=underground. Am I justified in retagging as man_made=pipeline location=underground? What to do with Way: 489841972 which seems from the imagery like a pit cover about 30cm off the ground? man_made=yes surface=concrete? Is it reasonable to change some directions so flow is to the south? Thanks Tony ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au