Thanks Andrew
I remember reading about the rights holder not having time to review their
CC-BY xx wording for a while yet, so CC-BY 3.0 is ok.
This is a large import so I we expect it to take some time to get right and it
is preferable to wait for that instead of mappers adding the data in a
piecemeal fashion prior.
Keep up the good work.
> On 29 Aug 2017, at 10:48 AM, Andrew Davidson wrote:
>
> The data came out over a month ago but I hadn't bothered to do any processing
> on it because I had been led to believe that the data was going to be
> released under CC-BY 4.0 and the OSM view seems to be that we need to get the
> rights holder to sign a wavier
> (https://www.mail-archive.com/talk-au@openstreetmap.org/msg10796.html) even
> if they had already said yes.
>
> However, I've just checked and the dataset is actually CC-BY 3.0 so we may
> still be OK to go.
>
> It'll take a while for me to recreate the processing I did on CAPAD2014 and
> I'm not sure when I'll have time to do it.
>
> On 29/8/17 10:16, nwastra wrote:
>> Further to my previous query…
>> I have viewed the thread leading to these…
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2017-February/011272.html
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2017-March/011302.html
>> and assume that the permission part is ok and the import is still on track.
>> Is there an update on the timeframe of the import?
>>> Hi
>>> I had been expecting that valid explicit permission to use Collaborative
>>> Australian Protected Areas Database (CAPAD) 2016 to edit and add
>>> information to the OpenStreetMap would have been obtained by now but I
>>> assume that the legal licence compatibility issues need to be resolved.
>>> Is there an estimated timeframe to resolution?
>>>
>>> regards
>>> Nev Wedding
>> ___
>> Talk-au mailing list
>> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au