Re: [talk-au] Mens Shed
Great, I've added https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:community_centre:for = men On 28 January 2018 at 10:16, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I have added a men's shed ... > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5359849540 > > tagged as an amenity=community_centrewith a website link. > > I know that past discussions have been had with someone from the shed > organisation that came to little > with some in the organisation saying it increased the theft risk. > This one is clearly visible from the main train line .. so is seen by many. > I think the tagging is ok. Any better tags? Or other thoughts? > I'll add it to the Australian guide lines .. once any discussion reaches a > conclusion. > > > ___ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
[talk-au] Mens Shed
Hi, I have added a men's shed ... https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5359849540 tagged as an amenity=community_centrewith a website link. I know that past discussions have been had with someone from the shed organisation that came to little with some in the organisation saying it increased the theft risk. This one is clearly visible from the main train line .. so is seen by many. I think the tagging is ok. Any better tags? Or other thoughts? I'll add it to the Australian guide lines .. once any discussion reaches a conclusion. ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] correct mapping of overtaking lanes
I've had a go at one overtaking lane, and thought I'd put it out there for comment before tackling more. Refer way 555706763 In this case, there is no overtaking (as in you can't use the lane in the opposing direction), but there are a couple (yet to be tackled) where it is permissable for the non-overtaking lane direction to use the overtaking lane (if not in use obviously). Ian -Original Message- From: Marc Gemis [mailto:marc.ge...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 24 January 2018 6:38 PM To: ianst...@iinet.net.au Cc: OSM Australian Talk List Subject: Re: [talk-au] correct mapping of overtaking lanes possible tags: lanes, lanes:forward, lanes:backward, change:lanes:forward, change:lanes:backward https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/change On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 8:11 AM, wrote: > Can someone point me to some examples of the correct method of mapping > overtaking lanes on country highways? > > > > I need examples for where it is both permissible and not permissible > for the contrary direction to use the overtaking lane. > > > > Thanks > > > > Ian > > > ___ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
