Re: [talk-au] NSW Fire Station names

2023-02-12 Thread Andrew Harvey
Echoing what cleary said about reliance on the DCS Base Map, it's not our
goal to recreate their label format.

In my opinion it's more important to have branch and ref tagged as it gives
more flexibility to data consumers on how they choose to label it, eg. they
could choose,

{branch} FS
{branch} Fire Station
{branch} Fire Station, {ref}
{operator} Station {ref}, {branch}

etc.

For the name I'd first go with any signage on the ground, but otherwise I
think "Lane Cove Fire Station" works well.

On Sun, 12 Feb 2023 at 22:01, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Note .. The Lane Cove Fire Station had 2 entries for the one feature,
> one on a single node the other on a way tagged for the building. I
> removed the duplicated tags from the building and place them on the
> node. No I am not doing this everywhere, I seek to separate the
> amenity=fire_station from the building=* and then expand the amenity to
> the boundaries usually beyond the building. Lane Cove did not lend
> itself to that. Still thinking on it, and a few other problem sites.
>

For fire stations that have grounds then yes you'd have
amenity=fire_station on the grounds with a seperate building=* way inside.
But for these city fire stations that don't have grounds and take up the
whole building, the amenity=fire_station -should go on the building way.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] NSW Fire Station names

2023-02-12 Thread Warin



On 12/2/23 21:02, cleary wrote:

In principle, I agree with Warin. My problem is relying on the Base Map as an 
authoritative source for names when there is other information.
What 'other information' that is OSM compatible for copyright? Note 
'other information' can be used to find stuff but not for entry into OSM 
but as a means to find it and then use OSM compatible sources to make 
the entry.


I just looked at Lane Cove Fire Station which has been recently re-tagged. It 
looks good to me.



The 'name' I think is ok.


The 'alt_name' I think should be 'official_name' ...


Note .. The Lane Cove Fire Station had 2 entries for the one feature, 
one on a single node the other on a way tagged for the building. I 
removed the duplicated tags from the building and place them on the 
node. No I am not doing this everywhere, I seek to separate the 
amenity=fire_station from the building=* and then expand the amenity to 
the boundaries usually beyond the building. Lane Cove did not lend 
itself to that. Still thinking on it, and a few other problem sites.



___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] NSW Fire Station names

2023-02-12 Thread cleary
In principle, I agree with Warin. My problem is relying on the Base Map as an 
authoritative source for names when there is other information.

I just looked at Lane Cove Fire Station which has been recently re-tagged. It 
looks good to me.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] NSW Fire Station names

2023-02-12 Thread Warin


On 12/2/23 09:30, cleary wrote:

I have one further comment about obsolete information on the DCS NSW Base Map.  
Located at 744 Carnarvon Highway, just north of Moree is a building that is 
labelled on the Base Map as OTC Satellite Earth Station. As far as I could find 
out, it ceased to have that purpose about 35 years ago but it has never been 
changed on the Base Map . That is the most obsolete item that I have identified 
but it is a reminder that names on the Base Map are not necessarily current.



Not a question of current but the normal, common, format of these 'names'.


Fire Station:

I gave one link to a table with 'names', and 'station numbers' from Fire 
and Rescue NSW that has the same names as DCS.


Press reports state the name in the same format;

Bombala Fire Station - 
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-10-08/bombala-fire-rescue-inspiring-female-firefighters/12741618 
- Later in the report there is a link to 
https://www.facebook.com/bombala230?fref=mentions and that uses 'Fire 
and Rescue NSW Station 230 Bombala' but in their text they use 'Station 
230' and 'FRNSW Bombala'.


Dungog Fire Station 
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-10-07/fire-and-rescue-nsw-investigating-claims-at-dungog-fire-station/11566342



Rural Fire Brigade:


"The NSW RFS comprises almost 2,000 rural fire brigades " 
https://www.rfs.nsw.gov.au/about-us


Press

Silverton Rural Fire Brigade 
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2008-08-20/firefighters-fear-station-closure/482634







On Sun, 12 Feb 2023, at 8:54 AM, cleary wrote:

The DCS NSW Base Map is a great resource but some aspects do not seem
to get updated e.g. roads that were once public but are now private may
still appear on the map to have former status (e.g. parts of
unincorporated area in western NSW), re-named roads may still show old
names, waterways show names contrary to those signposted at locations
(e.g. in Murray River LGA). As far as I can ascertain, there is no
regular process for updating the Base Map and it seems to depend on
each particular agency such as the local government body, Roads and
Maritime Services, Rural Fire Service or Health Service to instigate
changes of details for their assets. It does not always happen.

In the past I have contacted local councils about some conflicting
information and always have been given information that the Base Map
showed obsolete information. In regard to fire stations, I would think
the operators, Fire and Rescue NSW or the Rural Fire Service would be
the most authoritative sources regarding names for their facilities.

The Base Map is a wonderful resource that I have used extensively but I
have learned that if there is contradictory information from another
source, especially survey or the operators of the facilities, then the
information from the other source should prevail.



On Sat, 11 Feb 2023, at 9:58 PM, Warin wrote:

Hi,

I came across this while separating amenity=fire_station from their
building=*. The object is to map the amenity with all the name,
operator, etc tags on the amenity and leave the building alone.

The names on the DCS Base Map do not match some of the names on the OSM map.

For Fire and Rescue NSW the DCS base map has, for example ‘Lane Cove
Fire Station’ while OSM has ‘Fire and Rescue NSW Station 167 Lane Cove
(in the tagging guidelines). The number appears to be a ‘station number’
– seehttps://www.fire.nsw.gov.au/station_list/  The names there on the
station list comply with the DCS Base Map … and it is how I would ask
for them at the pub/in the street. I think the number may be best
entered under the tag ‘ref=*’ and the name as per the DCS Base Map. So
I'd like to change the names to comply wit the DCS Base Map.

Additional notes?

The name tag is for 'the common name'.

The long winded name looks to be some 'public service' name for pollies
to use  ..

And we have official_name ... "Useful where there is some elaborate
official name, while a different one is a common name typically used"


The quoted text comes from the OSM wiki.. honest.

--

For the Rural Fire Service some names are ‘Nowhere Rural Fire Service’
where the DCS Base Map would have ‘Nowhere RFB’ (‘Nowhere’ is an example
– don’t have one to hand). I take ‘RFB’ to be an abbreviation of ‘Rural
Fire Brigade’, where as  Rural Fire Service is an abbreviation of the
operator.

   I think ‘Nowhere Rural Fire Brigade’ is the correct name.

Thoughts??


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org