Re: [talk-au] Tagging Culverts on Roads
On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 at 13:54, Andrew Hughes wrote: > Yes... > > > https://vicroadsopendata-vicroadsmaps.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/ef496e07eae049a3bb94351bc496dd6a_0/explore?location=-36.518496%2C145.313781%2C7.55 > > https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ > Sorry, Andrew, but apparently not? I asked that question on Discord just the other day about somewhere else with that CC & got told No Way! :-( https://discord.com/channels/413070382636072960/763192797775265864/1076347259324739635 & a couple following if you're on it? I can copy the contents if needed? Thanks Graeme ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] Tagging Culverts on Roads
Yes... https://vicroadsopendata-vicroadsmaps.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/ef496e07eae049a3bb94351bc496dd6a_0/explore?location=-36.518496%2C145.313781%2C7.55 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ --Andrew On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 at 09:01, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 at 12:31, Andrew Hughes wrote: > >> And each culvert has a unique asset/ref identification (example Victorian >> Dept of Transport, Structure Number == SN2252) >> >> > Sorry to be awkward, but do we have permission to use that data? > > Thanks > > Graeme > > ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] NSW Bridal Track
Australian road tagging guidelines at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Roads arguably override the general OSM guidelines, and they read: highway=track: "Service and access roads that aren't part of the general road network. Generally not paved, often not public access for vehicles."... in rural "Fire trails, forest drives, 4WD tracks, and similar roads. highway=unclassified is: "Minor roads that are neither tertiary or residential roads. Not generally through routes." Given that, I'd argue =track is the right option. A tangent, but I'm rather happy that iD _*finally_* fixed their English description for =track (it included "unmaintained" for a long time; many were quite annoyed at the original change to include that)... and I can't find any discussion about why they finally gave in and reverted it! Vested interest, since it along with =path are likely my two most used, given I map a lot of bush with fire trails and run/ride singletrack. On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 at 09:23, cleary wrote: > > The name should not constrain the classification of the highway (e.g. > Dowling Track, Ooodnadatta Track). And, as I've commented previously in > other threads, the DCS NSW Base Map can be quite outdated. > > However, a quick look at a YouTube video suggests that the Bridle Track > should still be tagged as 4WD only (it was signposted as such and probably > still is). Wikipedia reports that part of the route is new, apparently a > diversion around the landslide that blocked the old track at Monaghans > Bluff. I'd prefer not to change the OSM tags etc until someone surveys the > route. > > > > On Mon, 20 Feb 2023, at 9:17 PM, Warin wrote: > > Hi > > > > This track is now continuous having been closed due to a rock fall and > > road collapse at Monaghans Bluff. > > > > > > Given the importance of the road and that it is not really a 'track' in > > the OSM sense (Roads for mostly agricultural or forestry uses) ... and > > that the DCS Base Map places it at least tertiary level I would think > > that all of this 'track' be classified in OSM as 'unclassified'. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] NSW Bridal Track
The name should not constrain the classification of the highway (e.g. Dowling Track, Ooodnadatta Track). And, as I've commented previously in other threads, the DCS NSW Base Map can be quite outdated. However, a quick look at a YouTube video suggests that the Bridle Track should still be tagged as 4WD only (it was signposted as such and probably still is). Wikipedia reports that part of the route is new, apparently a diversion around the landslide that blocked the old track at Monaghans Bluff. I'd prefer not to change the OSM tags etc until someone surveys the route. On Mon, 20 Feb 2023, at 9:17 PM, Warin wrote: > Hi > > This track is now continuous having been closed due to a rock fall and > road collapse at Monaghans Bluff. > > > Given the importance of the road and that it is not really a 'track' in > the OSM sense (Roads for mostly agricultural or forestry uses) ... and > that the DCS Base Map places it at least tertiary level I would think > that all of this 'track' be classified in OSM as 'unclassified'. > > > Thoughts? > > > ___ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
[talk-au] NSW Bridal Track
Hi This track is now continuous having been closed due to a rock fall and road collapse at Monaghans Bluff. Given the importance of the road and that it is not really a 'track' in the OSM sense (Roads for mostly agricultural or forestry uses) ... and that the DCS Base Map places it at least tertiary level I would think that all of this 'track' be classified in OSM as 'unclassified'. Thoughts? ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
