[talk-au] Marsh shading in Osmarender

2010-03-21 Thread Simon Biber
It seems the shading for marsh / wetland is stuffed up in north-western 
Adelaide (Rosewater, Gillman, Wingfield, Pennington, Athol Park), with large 
areas marked as marsh that shouldn't be.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-34.8384lon=138.5531zoom=14layers=0B00FTF

Is this a bug with Osmarender or a problem with the surrounding tagging? It all 
looks fine in Mapnik.

Regards
Simon.


  

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Marsh shading in Osmarender

2010-03-21 Thread David Murn
On Sun, 2010-03-21 at 07:55 -0700, Simon Biber wrote:
 It seems the shading for marsh / wetland is stuffed up in north-western
  Adelaide (Rosewater, Gillman, Wingfield, Pennington, Athol Park), with
  large areas marked as marsh that shouldn't be.
 
 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-34.8384lon=138.5531zoom=14layers=0B00FTF
 
 Is this a bug with Osmarender or a problem with the surrounding tagging? It 
 all looks fine in Mapnik.

If youre referring to the areas that look like marshland around Garden
Island, there are a lot of ways around tagged with natural=wetland,
wetland=mangrove, for example
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/27377526

If this isnt the area youre talking about, or if theres other areas you
want to check, click the + symbol at the top/right of slippymap and turn
on the data layer, this will show you all the nodes, ways and areas as
black outlined areas that you can click on (even in view mode).

David


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Marsh shading in Osmarender

2010-03-21 Thread John Henderson
On 22/03/10 01:55, Simon Biber wrote:
 It seems the shading for marsh / wetland is stuffed up in north-western 
 Adelaide (Rosewater, Gillman, Wingfield, Pennington, Athol Park), with large 
 areas marked as marsh that shouldn't be.

 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-34.8384lon=138.5531zoom=14layers=0B00FTF

 Is this a bug with Osmarender or a problem with the surrounding tagging? It 
 all looks fine in Mapnik.

It looks to me to be a result of natural=wetland tags being applied to 
open-ended ways instead of to areas (enclosed).

John H

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au