Re: [talk-au] Next tagging clean up project
Hi Graeme, I reckon the vast majority of the ‘sheds’ are currently tagged building=fire_station. I think I will start in Tassie, as I have been to many of the stations, and see what else crops before moving to any other states. Thanks for all the thoughts folks Cheers - Phil From: Graeme Fitzpatrick Sent: Tuesday, 11 October 2022 9:21 AM To: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [talk-au] Next tagging clean up project On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 at 18:10, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com <mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com> > wrote: The name of the station/brigade/* goes on the 'plot' not the building. I'm not certain of the operator tags - I think only on the amenity/plot not on the building .. ? Both of those are how I currently do it, except in the cases of joint use buildings, in which case that name etc goes on a node inside the building. Question re building=fire_station though - do we still use that, when it's only a shed to look at? Thanks Graeme ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] Next tagging clean up project
On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 at 18:10, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > The name of the station/brigade/* goes on the 'plot' not the building. > > I'm not certain of the operator tags - I think only on the amenity/plot > not on the building .. ? > Both of those are how I currently do it, except in the cases of joint use buildings, in which case that name etc goes on a node inside the building. Question re building=fire_station though - do we still use that, when it's only a shed to look at? Thanks Graeme ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] Next tagging clean up project
On 10/10/22 10:40, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: On Sun, 9 Oct 2022 at 19:14, Phil Wyatt wrote: Should it always be the case that the ‘plot’ on which the fire station building resides is the ‘amenity’ and the ‘building’ should be separate within the plot? To me, its not 100% clear in the wiki’s. That was the way I thought it was supposed to work? That is 'ideal'. However the 'plot' may not be obvious, in that case I use a node within the building. In NSW there is the DCS Base Map .. but even then some of them have no obvious bounds for the plot. The name of the station/brigade/* goes on the 'plot' not the building. I'm not certain of the operator tags - I think only on the amenity/plot not on the building .. ? ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] Next tagging clean up project
On Sun, 9 Oct 2022 at 19:14, Phil Wyatt wrote: > > > Should it always be the case that the ‘plot’ on which the fire station > building resides is the ‘amenity’ and the ‘building’ should be separate > within the plot? To me, its not 100% clear in the wiki’s. > That was the way I thought it was supposed to work? I also notice that both the amenity grounds, & also the actual building are both now rendered! (Same for Police, but still nothing for ambo's :-() You also just reminded me to check info to confirm details on a local station & I found: https://www.data.qld.gov.au/dataset/rural-fire-stations/resource/e09d0d06-b13e-4e52-b82d-1ce0cf05927c. May be worth while contacting them to see if we could use it? Thanks Graeme ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
[talk-au] Next tagging clean up project
Hi Folks, I am looking for my next tagging clean-up project and wondered about amenity and building tags for fire stations amenity=fire_station - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfire_station - https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1mAq building=fire_station - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dfire_station - https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1mAr This is partly in response to an issue logged for the ID editor requesting a preset for fire stations buildings. https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/603 There is already an ID preset for 'Fire Station' that uses the amenity=fire_station key/value but it did get me looking at the differences and how its been applied in Australia. There is a clear mix of buildings and amenity tagging on both station areas and buildings, and some with both tags! https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/australia-oceania/australia/tags/amenity=fire_s tation#combinations Should it always be the case that the 'plot' on which the fire station building resides is the 'amenity' and the 'building' should be separate within the plot? To me, its not 100% clear in the wiki's. Any thoughts? Cheers - Phil ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
