Re: [talk-au] Possible illegal imports in Western Australia (Andy Townsend)

[Andy Townsend]

On 18/07/2016 14:13, Warren wrote:
I am reasonably local.  Both areas have had recent road building.  But 
I think they are now complete.  I will divert when I am close and 
resort to a gps trace. 


Excellent stuff - thanks.

Best Regards,

Andy


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Possible illegal imports in Western Australia (Andy Townsend)

[Warren]

I am reasonably local.  Both areas have had recent road building.  But I 
think they are now complete.  I will divert when I am close and resort 
to a gps trace.


It may take a week or so, but when I am close I will divert.

Warren


On 18/07/2016 8:00 PM, talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:

Send Talk-au mailing list submissions to
talk-au@openstreetmap.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
talk-au-ow...@openstreetmap.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Talk-au digest..."


Today's Topics:

1. Re: Possible illegal imports in Western Australia (Andy Townsend)
2. Re: Possible illegal imports in Western Australia (Warin)
3. Re: CC 4.0 was Re: Response regarding use of PSMA
   Administrative Boundaries (Australia) (Reuben)
4. Almost finished LPI Post Offices (Frank)


--

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 20:31:45 +0100
From: Andy Townsend 
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Possible illegal imports in Western Australia
Message-ID: <578bdd21.3020...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

For info, I've just finishing reverting the remaining nodes from these
imports.  The last one was
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40792543 .  As previously
mentioned upthread, many of the objects had already been removed but
some of the nodes from some of the larger changesets remained.

Two issues that I spotted on the way through I've commented on on:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40195315

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40195392

It'd be great if a Perth local could have a look at those.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse), on behalf of the Data Working Group.





--

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 09:32:34 +1000
From: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Possible illegal imports in Western Australia
Message-ID: <3a43c7ef-2eb2-b5f0-3caa-a25785e1d...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

On 7/18/2016 5:31 AM, Andy Townsend wrote:

For info, I've just finishing reverting the remaining nodes from these
imports.  The last one was
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40792543 .  As previously
mentioned upthread, many of the objects had already been removed but
some of the nodes from some of the larger changesets remained.

Two issues that I spotted on the way through I've commented on on:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40195315

Using Strava cyclist heat map it looks to me like the roundabout (way
361673628) should be  a smaller diameter.
The other roundabout (north western side) way 351188658  has used the
same diameter, that too may need to be reduced?

Bing, AGRI and Mapbox imagery are not upto date in this area so cannot
be used.


https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40195392

Similar situation - not available in the present imagery.
Way Arthur Street 37451474
Way Lord Street 346140242 and part of way 318945115.


It'd be great if a Perth local could have a look at those.

Might take some time.
In the short term would it not be 'better' to;

1) Reduce the roundabout diameters and remove the kinks (probably a more
truthfull representation of what is there)

2) Reduce the portrayed importance to the sections of these roads?

And then place fixmes on the ways?



--

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 12:38:21 +1000
From: Reuben 
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] CC 4.0 was Re: Response regarding use of PSMA
Administrative Boundaries (Australia)
Message-ID: <8939a6e0-8a4f-9fd0-74c8-db7266e7e...@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"

Perhaps someone should make a submission to the Productivity Commission
inquiry if it is the former:

 Forwarded Message 
Subject:[talk-au] The Australian Productivity Commission public
inquiry on Data Availability and Use.
Date:   Sat, 16 Jul 2016 15:35:35 +1000
To: OSM Australian Talk List 



for info…
The public inquiry will investigate ways to improve the availability and
use of public and private sector data.
The Australian Productivity Commission has released an issues paper and
is asking for feedback.
Initial submissions are due by Friday 29 July 2016.

http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/current/data-access


Reuben
On 16/07/16 13:38, Paul Norman wrote:

On 7/12/2016 1:50 AM, Simon Poole wrote:

- the additional requirement to adhere to the AUS privacy regulations
was not addressed in the response, which in itself would be