Hi Anthony,
I'm not particularly interested in previous disagreements, so I'm not
going to wade into this other "bus stop" issue.
It is clear that there is a disconnect between what you understand these
edits are doing to routing algorithms, and what the other editors are
explaining is happening. In particular, the method you are using to
model intersections (using separate ways for turns where no physical
separation) is causing extra complexity and errors. The wiki is a good
place to start for more detail, as is
https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-for-navigation/modeling-intersections-for-map-navigation/
I am happy to spend time going into this in more detail, but mailing
lists tend to be a bad forum for really detailed conversation and these
resources are a good start.
Dian
On 2022-05-01 02:50, Anthony Panozzo wrote:
What that luke person was talking about was a bus stop node upgrade
which took place a few months ago, the kids on discord argued that
there might be a 1 in million "edge case" which will ruin the map, so
my mass edit was reverted and they have to be edited individually, now
the same people came out of nowhere because they see me posting here
and argue that this guy is free to go about clicking buttons based on
the validator and there will never ever be an edge case scenario. With
these kids it's personal they don't make any sense and that's why that
kids decided to come in here and bring up bus stops lmao.
From: talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Saturday, 30 April 2022 10:55 PM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Talk-au Digest, Vol 178, Issue 57
Send Talk-au mailing list submissions to
talk-au@openstreetmap.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
talk-au-ow...@openstreetmap.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Talk-au digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 178, Issue 55
(Andy Townsend (ajt1...@gmail.com))
--
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 14:21:34 +0100
From: "Andy Townsend (ajt1...@gmail.com)"
Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 178, Issue 55
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I suspect that no-one is taking the piss - depending on the mail client
"reply all" will very often go to the sender cc the list.
Perhaps a bit more discussion about what problems have been created
might
have helped (and "source=knowledge") isn't a great description of why
something was changed, but to an outsider it does look like a couple of
rounds of polite questions were mossing before the "wtf is going on" on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120344373#map=19/-34.76638/138.58995
.
Where there are turn restrictions missing something vital like "from"
or
"to" sometimes it's obvious what needs to be re-added, and sometimes
actually deleting it is just fine because other tags (such as oneway)
are
doing the same job.
Where you think a turn restriction has been deleted in error, perhaps
it
would help to comment why that was in error?
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022, 13:18 Anthony Panozzo, wrote:
Im not it?s 100% true, youre the one taking the piss by jumping in
this
conversation and just speaking on behalf of the other person involved
when
the matter was already discussed and sorted. Please do not email me
directly
*From: *talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org
*Sent: *Saturday, 30 April 2022 9:41 PM
*To: *talk-au@openstreetmap.org
*Subject: *Talk-au Digest, Vol 178, Issue 55
Send Talk-au mailing list submissions to
talk-au@openstreetmap.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
talk-au-ow...@openstreetmap.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Talk-au digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 178, Issue 48 (Luke Stewart)
--
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 22:07:00 +1000
From: Luke Stewart
To: Anthony Panozzo
Cc: OSM Australian Talk List
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 178, Issue 48
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Can someone else please confirm that this guy is just taking the piss?
Cheers,
Luke
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 at 21:58, Anthony Panozzo
wrote:
I didn?t realise you emailed me directly I am going to have to block
you
from doing so in the future, it?s against OSM au-talk policy
*From: *Luke Stewart
*Sent: *Saturday, 30 April 2022 9:21 PM
