Re: [talk-au] What's best to do with ways split by decliners?
Am 01.07.2012 14:06, schrieb Mark Pulley: Presumably in that case, even though the way is (magically) fixed, the nodes haven't been, so the way will still disappear once the nodes have been deleted (as the Badmap view doesn't take into account the ODBL status of the nodes) By definition the nodes in a way that has been split and then rejoined haven't changed their state at all, so would still be good if they started off so (assuming no intermediate edits). ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] What's best to do with ways split by decliners?
On 01/07/2012, at 9:29 AM, John Henderson wrote: There's another side to this coin. When fixing ways scheduled for deletion, it's often useful to split a very long way, delete the section to be fixed from a GPS trace, and recreate that section. The problem is that whenever a split is made, one section of the two results maintains the attributes of the original. But the second section becomes version 1, and with the accepter attributes of the person doing the splitting. So it's (magically) fixed and no longer scheduled for deletion, despite the fact that no accepter has surveyed it. This is a case in point, the result of a split by me recently: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/169517220/history Presumably in that case, even though the way is (magically) fixed, the nodes haven't been, so the way will still disappear once the nodes have been deleted (as the Badmap view doesn't take into account the ODBL status of the nodes) Mark P. ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
[talk-au] What's best to do with ways split by decliners?
I have noticed in my local area that there are some ways that I added (as version 1), that have subsequently been split by ODBL-decliners. The new ways created by them are currently showing up in the badmap view at http://cleanmap.poole.ch/ . What is the best way to rescue this data (as the nodes are still my version 1 nodes, apart from the additional nodes where the way is split). Is merging the new ways back into my version 1 way enough to save this data (removing the additional nodes)? Example - shared footway/cycleway: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-33.405771lon=149.604525zoom=18layers=M http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/29702607- my original way http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/38534914 - additional way containing my nodes (apart from one end of the bridge) http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/38534913 - additional way containing only decliner nodes (the two ends of the bridge) Mark P. ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
