[talk-au] redaction cleanup - unusual water feature
I would also reuse the existing nodes and tag as natural= water just make sure the join between the 'lake' and the coastline share two nodes. In Aus we call them Canals but they obviously not the same as a canal in the UK though I have seen them tagged waterway=canal also. I prefer to have the coastline at the edge of the sea, ie across a river mouth, though I see there is discussion about having all the tidal part as coastline, but I don't no how you work that out from a quick survey or Bing. Peter W ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] redaction cleanup - unusual water feature
As others have said , I'd re-use the existing nodes. I'd probably tag this as natural = water David - Original Message - From: Chris Barham To: talk-au Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 7:21 PM Subject: [talk-au] redaction cleanup - unusual water feature Hi, I'm working on the post redaction checks from the rebuild server at http://rebuild.poole.ch/job/29 And I'm a bit confused by this: http://osm.org/go/ueHoaPP9-- If you look at Bing imagery for this location it is composed of some sort of inland harbour/marina/coastline/water feature which had previously been mapped (rather elegantly too by the look of it), from Nearmap as source. Post redaction there are the outline nodes left,and I'm was wondering how to go about reinstating this coastline/water? Join up the existing nodes? Start again? What tags? Cheers, Chas -- ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] redaction cleanup - unusual water feature
I'd join up the existing nodes if possible. South-East Queensland has many of these canal systems in residential areas. Take a look at the Gold Coast region for some tips if you want examples - http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-28.0229&lon=153.4144&zoom=14&layers=M Miami in Florida might be another place to reference for such features. BJ Sent from my iPad On 25/08/2012, at 4:21, Chris Barham wrote: > Hi, > I'm working on the post redaction checks from the rebuild server at > http://rebuild.poole.ch/job/29 > > And I'm a bit confused by this: http://osm.org/go/ueHoaPP9-- > > If you look at Bing imagery for this location it is composed of some sort of > inland harbour/marina/coastline/water feature which had previously been > mapped (rather elegantly too by the look of it), from Nearmap as source. > Post redaction there are the outline nodes left,and I'm was wondering how to > go about reinstating this coastline/water? Join up the existing nodes? > Start again? What tags? > > Cheers, > Chas > > ___ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] redaction cleanup - unusual water feature
Am 24.08.2012 20:21, schrieb Chris Barham: Hi, If you look at Bing imagery for this location it is composed of some sort of inland harbour/marina/coastline/water feature which had previously been mapped (rather elegantly too by the look of it), from Nearmap as source. Post redaction there are the outline nodes left,and I'm was wondering how to go about reinstating this coastline/water? Join up the existing nodes? Start again? What tags? I would re-use the existing nodes. Regarding tagging I was about to suggest natural=water but then I did some reading in the wiki. So I think natural=coastline is the right thing to use. There's a similar structure a bit south which is tagged as waterway=riverbank - I don't think that's a good idea. Michael ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
[talk-au] redaction cleanup - unusual water feature
Hi, I'm working on the post redaction checks from the rebuild server at http://rebuild.poole.ch/job/29 And I'm a bit confused by this: http://osm.org/go/ueHoaPP9-- If you look at Bing imagery for this location it is composed of some sort of inland harbour/marina/coastline/water feature which had previously been mapped (rather elegantly too by the look of it), from Nearmap as source. Post redaction there are the outline nodes left,and I'm was wondering how to go about reinstating this coastline/water? Join up the existing nodes? Start again? What tags? Cheers, Chas ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au