Re: [talk-au] OSM Attribution Q
And I also reported another attribution error: From: Mapbox Support To: Forster Reply-To: Mapbox Support Subject:Mapbox Support - we received your message Thanks for contacting Mapbox Support! We've received your message. If you have an emergency or see a disruption in service, please see http://status.mapbox.com/ for critical updates. If you haven't already, check out our great documentation and guides for more resources (like our https://docs.mapbox.com/api/;>API Documentation and https://docs.mapbox.com/help/;>Help pages) -- the answer to your question might just be there! If you are a Premium, Business, or Essential support plan customer, please disregard the following and expect a reply from our team within the agreed upon SLAs for your plan. We are experiencing a high volume of tickets coming in. If you haven't purchased one of our href="https://www.mapbox.com/support#support-plans;>support plans, we may not be able to respond to your question. For faster help, get advice from the larger community of developers building with Mapbox by https://stackoverflow.com/questions/ask;>submitting your question on Stack Overflow using the href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/mapbox;>Mapbox tag. With our href="https://account.mapbox.com/subscriptions/;>Essential, Business or Premium support plans, we guarantee engagement with our team within a certain time window - check out our href="https://www.mapbox.com/support#support-plans;>Mapbox Support Plans page to learn more. When contacting the Mapbox Support team directly, href="https://support.mapbox.com/;>tickets opened via our contact form will be prioritized over tickets submitted via email. To ensure the best support experience, we highly recommend using one of the above approaches. Happy mapping! The Mapbox team On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 07:42, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: Hi Sergey Thanks for that! I reported it online & received an acknowledgement, & it was reported via this form: https://support.mapbox.com/hc/en-us/requests/new?ticket_form_id=36308212 Hope that helps? Thanks Graeme ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] OSM Attribution Q
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 07:42, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > Hi Sergey > > Thanks for that! > > I reported it online & received an acknowledgement, > & it was reported via this form: https://support.mapbox.com/hc/en-us/requests/new?ticket_form_id=36308212 Hope that helps? Thanks Graeme ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] OSM Attribution Q
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 at 22:04, Sergey Beliamei wrote: > Hello, Graeme! > I work at MapBox. We did not receive a message from you, please, tell me > what address you sent it to? > > Best regards, > Member of Mapbox team, > Sergey > Hi Sergey Thanks for that! I reported it online & received an acknowledgement, which I'll send through in a moment. Thanks Graeme ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] OSM Attribution Q
Oops mapbox not matchbox Hi A related case, the Victorian government seems to be using OSM without attribution. Again it is Matchbox. I have written to the government a couple of times, the replies have been polite but no result, i think its just too hard for them. If talking to Matchbox, please mention this one. Tony Department of Premier and Cabinet Hi I have written to you once already, I think by the Contact us web form around June 4th. The map at https://engage.vic.gov.au/CardiniaCkParklands is in breach of copyright. Matchbox copyright is acknowledged by you but though they may hold the rights to the satellite image they are not the owner of the text labels. The text labels are copyright Open Street Map. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright for instructions I ask that you immediately either remove the map or credit the copyright holder in the specified manner. Thanks On Sun, 14 Aug 2022 at 20:28, Bob Cameron wrote: Looking at petrolspy.com.au website for Theodore Qld and note that the sport and rec ground shows a remarkable similarity to the changes/updates I did 10 months ago, I spotted exactly the same thing locally, with a bushland track that I added also appearing on their map. PetrolSpy apparently uses MapBox, so I've sent a message to MB asking them to please look into it. That was last week, but nothing so far other than an automatic acknowledgement. Thanks Graeme r ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au _ This mail has been virus scanned by Australia On Line see http://www.australiaonline.net.au/mailscanning ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] OSM Attribution Q
Hi A related case, the Victorian government seems to be using OSM without attribution. Again it is Matchbox. I have written to the government a couple of times, the replies have been polite but no result, i think its just too hard for them. If talking to Matchbox, please mention this one. Tony Department of Premier and Cabinet Hi I have written to you once already, I think by the Contact us web form around June 4th. The map at https://engage.vic.gov.au/CardiniaCkParklands is in breach of copyright. Matchbox copyright is acknowledged by you but though they may hold the rights to the satellite image they are not the owner of the text labels. The text labels are copyright Open Street Map. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright for instructions I ask that you immediately either remove the map or credit the copyright holder in the specified manner. Thanks On Sun, 14 Aug 2022 at 20:28, Bob Cameron wrote: Looking at petrolspy.com.au website for Theodore Qld and note that the sport and rec ground shows a remarkable similarity to the changes/updates I did 10 months ago, I spotted exactly the same thing locally, with a bushland track that I added also appearing on their map. PetrolSpy apparently uses MapBox, so I've sent a message to MB asking them to please look into it. That was last week, but nothing so far other than an automatic acknowledgement. Thanks Graeme r ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] OSM Attribution Q
On Sun, 14 Aug 2022 at 20:28, Bob Cameron wrote: > > Looking at petrolspy.com.au website for Theodore Qld and note that the > sport and rec ground shows a remarkable similarity to the > changes/updates I did 10 months ago, I spotted exactly the same thing locally, with a bushland track that I added also appearing on their map. PetrolSpy apparently uses MapBox, so I've sent a message to MB asking them to please look into it. That was last week, but nothing so far other than an automatic acknowledgement. Thanks Graeme > r > ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] OSM Attribution Q
They have been requested at least once before. I have just sent another email https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lacking_proper_attribution -Original Message- From: Paul Norman via Talk-au Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2022 8:47 PM To: Bob Cameron ; OSM Australian Talk List Subject: Re: [talk-au] OSM Attribution Q On 2022-08-14 3:23 a.m., Bob Cameron wrote: > I likely have this wrong, but worth a question. > > Looking at petrolspy.com.au website for Theodore Qld and note that the > sport and rec ground shows a remarkable similarity to the > changes/updates I did 10 months ago, right down to the service road > loop around the RV dump. In addition the petrolspy map has copied the > campsite rather than the reserve name. > > There is no attribution I can see, but the site does have Google ads. > The contact domain (email) is MX'd to Google. They are using a map from maptiler, which uses OpenStreetMap data. I would contact them at the email on their site, explaining that they're using a Map based on OpenStreetMap data, and they are required to attribute, which is generally done in one of the bottom corners of the map. ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] OSM Attribution Q
On 2022-08-14 3:23 a.m., Bob Cameron wrote: I likely have this wrong, but worth a question. Looking at petrolspy.com.au website for Theodore Qld and note that the sport and rec ground shows a remarkable similarity to the changes/updates I did 10 months ago, right down to the service road loop around the RV dump. In addition the petrolspy map has copied the campsite rather than the reserve name. There is no attribution I can see, but the site does have Google ads. The contact domain (email) is MX'd to Google. They are using a map from maptiler, which uses OpenStreetMap data. I would contact them at the email on their site, explaining that they're using a Map based on OpenStreetMap data, and they are required to attribute, which is generally done in one of the bottom corners of the map. ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
