Re: [talk-au] Wikifiddling

2010-04-28 Thread Roy Wallace
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Emilie Laffray
 wrote:
>
> I believe that a separate wiki can be useful at cases, if not only for the
> case that it can be potentially be easier to search and to work from it.

In my opinion, this kind of "fragmentation" is something to be avoided
- lest we likewise end up with a separate Australian OSM database...

Liz, are you inferring that the problem is vandalism of Australian
content on the OSM wiki? Or something more subtle? I would like to
think that these problems can be handled (somehow??) without the last
resort of starting an entirely separate wiki.

That said, without knowing the details of the problems you're actually
talking about, it's hard to comment further.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Wikifiddling

2010-04-28 Thread John Smith
On 28 April 2010 23:11, David Murn  wrote:
> If you read what I said, you'll note the end of the sentence 'are
> rendered currently'.  Yes, anyone can ask for anything to be rendered,
> but Im wondering how someone can tag stuff without bothering to read the
> wiki.

I could comment that you are assuming the only things rendered are on
the "official" list, but I can't be bothered to prove things either
way just to make a point.

> Then again, people not knowing about the existing tagging system might
> explain some of the weird things Ive found in keepright, such as the
> aforementioned 'highway=Dirt-track' tag I found a couple of times and
> tagged properly.

Again, you are assuming this issue came up entirely due to
disagreements on tagging, this isn't the case and this is why this
issue has come up.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Wikifiddling

2010-04-28 Thread Emilie Laffray
On 28 April 2010 13:25, David Murn  wrote:

> On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 11:12 +0100, Emilie Laffray wrote:
>
> > I personally don't use the wiki so I am not going to make much
> > comments about what is going on...
>
> Just out of interest, if you dont use the wiki to figure out what tags
> to use, how DO you decide how to tag items?  Do you just make things up,
> or are you referencing some other non-wiki source, which may also need
> to be kept up-to-date with Aussie specific comments.
>
>
I don't make things up. I learn from existing features from the map, from
other contributors and finally from tools like osmdoc or tagwatch. I do
check occasionnally the wiki from time to time, but I don't spend my life on
it. In addition, all my major contributions have been road network based
from the French cadastre in my home town, and coastline fixing around the
world.


>
> The tags can be whatever values you wish to put in, but only the agreed
> upon tags are rendered currently.  If someone in Germany tags
> highway=autobahn or someone in Italy tags it as highway=superstrada
> (relative to the country where they live), it wont render.  Just like if
> someone decides to tag a way as highway=dirt-road, sure you CAN tag it
> like that, but it wont render how it would if it were tagged properly.
>
>
You are making assumptions about how I work which have absolutely no basis.
You can do things without necessarily having to read in detail the wiki,
while keeping up with more recent tags and methods through social
interaction. It is not just a matter of who is reading the most of the wiki.
In addition, I tend to care more about the data than the map itself, and
that's why I am using tools like osmdoc and tagwatch to make sure that when
I use a tag it is already being used.
I have some contribution on the wiki namely the technical aspect of the
Corine Land Cover import made in France with all the sql.
Plus John has been making some very valid comments too on which I agree.

Emilie Laffray
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Wikifiddling

2010-04-28 Thread David Murn
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 22:30 +1000, John Smith wrote:

> > The tags can be whatever values you wish to put in, but only the agreed
> > upon tags are rendered currently.  If someone in Germany tags
> > highway=autobahn or someone in Italy tags it as highway=superstrada
> > (relative to the country where they live), it wont render.  Just like if
> > someone decides to tag a way as highway=dirt-road, sure you CAN tag it
> > like that, but it wont render how it would if it were tagged properly.
> 
> That's not true, anyone can ask for anything to be rendered... There
> is nothing stopping people mass mapping a new tag type, and then
> requesting it gets rendered or they render their own map tiles, in any
> case this isn't just about the documentation on specific tags.

If you read what I said, you'll note the end of the sentence 'are
rendered currently'.  Yes, anyone can ask for anything to be rendered,
but Im wondering how someone can tag stuff without bothering to read the
wiki.

Then again, people not knowing about the existing tagging system might
explain some of the weird things Ive found in keepright, such as the
aforementioned 'highway=Dirt-track' tag I found a couple of times and
tagged properly.

David


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Wikifiddling

2010-04-28 Thread John Smith
On 28 April 2010 22:25, David Murn  wrote:
> Just out of interest, if you dont use the wiki to figure out what tags
> to use, how DO you decide how to tag items?  Do you just make things up,
> or are you referencing some other non-wiki source, which may also need
> to be kept up-to-date with Aussie specific comments.

It's not tag specific, but information, think of it as translations
from UK english into AU english...

> The tags can be whatever values you wish to put in, but only the agreed
> upon tags are rendered currently.  If someone in Germany tags
> highway=autobahn or someone in Italy tags it as highway=superstrada
> (relative to the country where they live), it wont render.  Just like if
> someone decides to tag a way as highway=dirt-road, sure you CAN tag it
> like that, but it wont render how it would if it were tagged properly.

That's not true, anyone can ask for anything to be rendered... There
is nothing stopping people mass mapping a new tag type, and then
requesting it gets rendered or they render their own map tiles, in any
case this isn't just about the documentation on specific tags.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Wikifiddling

2010-04-28 Thread David Murn
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 11:12 +0100, Emilie Laffray wrote:

> I personally don't use the wiki so I am not going to make much
> comments about what is going on...

Just out of interest, if you dont use the wiki to figure out what tags
to use, how DO you decide how to tag items?  Do you just make things up,
or are you referencing some other non-wiki source, which may also need
to be kept up-to-date with Aussie specific comments.

> but I can see why it would be very annoying to someone, especially
> while they are some very country specific elements sometimes, and that
> by definition tags are not absolute but relative to the country where
> you live.

The tags can be whatever values you wish to put in, but only the agreed
upon tags are rendered currently.  If someone in Germany tags
highway=autobahn or someone in Italy tags it as highway=superstrada
(relative to the country where they live), it wont render.  Just like if
someone decides to tag a way as highway=dirt-road, sure you CAN tag it
like that, but it wont render how it would if it were tagged properly.

David


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Wikifiddling

2010-04-28 Thread Emilie Laffray
On 28 April 2010 11:05, John Smith  wrote:

> On 28 April 2010 19:26, Elizabeth Dodd  wrote:
> >> > I think that we need to put our stuff on our own wiki.
> >>
> >> I don't see how you reached that conclusion.
> >>
> > Because this is a public list and what I would have written in
> explanation is
> > either rude or possibly defamatory.
> > I read the rss feed from the wiki changes and I have watched recent
> events.
> > Nothing more will I say.
>
> While I'm privy to some of Liz's grievances, the bigger problem is
> Aussie specific information being drowned out with all the other
> information. Unless you knew where to find information about Aussie
> mapping parties, you won't easily find it.
>
> The same goes for other Aussie specific information, it takes time and
> effort to drill through links to find things, only to find out someone
> has merged in a bunch of information from other unrelated countries so
> on and so forth.
>
>
Hello,

just to add my 2 cents on the topic, I don't think it is an Australian
related problem in itself. I would say that the problem is exacerbated by
the fact that you share the same language as other countries. It is common
to see some people to try to update the pages according to what is present
internationally.
I believe that a separate wiki can be useful at cases, if not only for the
case that it can be potentially be easier to search and to work from it.
Several other communities are thinking about the same thing in order to have
something not as intimidating in the end.
I do believe though that at least people try to keep a minimum of Australian
specific page on the main wiki and try to get everything synchronised in the
end.
I personally don't use the wiki so I am not going to make much comments
about what is going on, but I can see why it would be very annoying to
someone, especially while they are some very country specific elements
sometimes, and that by definition tags are not absolute but relative to the
country where you live.

Emilie Laffray
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Wikifiddling

2010-04-28 Thread John Smith
On 28 April 2010 19:26, Elizabeth Dodd  wrote:
>> > I think that we need to put our stuff on our own wiki.
>>
>> I don't see how you reached that conclusion.
>>
> Because this is a public list and what I would have written in explanation is
> either rude or possibly defamatory.
> I read the rss feed from the wiki changes and I have watched recent events.
> Nothing more will I say.

While I'm privy to some of Liz's grievances, the bigger problem is
Aussie specific information being drowned out with all the other
information. Unless you knew where to find information about Aussie
mapping parties, you won't easily find it.

The same goes for other Aussie specific information, it takes time and
effort to drill through links to find things, only to find out someone
has merged in a bunch of information from other unrelated countries so
on and so forth.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Wikifiddling

2010-04-28 Thread Elizabeth Dodd
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, Roy Wallace wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Liz  wrote:
> > I think that we need to put our stuff on our own wiki.
> 
> I don't see how you reached that conclusion.
> 
Because this is a public list and what I would have written in explanation is 
either rude or possibly defamatory.
I read the rss feed from the wiki changes and I have watched recent events. 
Nothing more will I say.


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Wikifiddling

2010-04-28 Thread Roy Wallace
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Liz  wrote:
>
> I think that we need to put our stuff on our own wiki.

I don't see how you reached that conclusion.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au