Re: [OSM-talk-be] My first attempt at a boundary

[Kurt Roeckx]

On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 11:26:27PM +0100, Jo wrote:
> I haven't worked on boundaries before, but this discussion triggered it.
> 
> So I added boundary=postal_code relations for 3000, 3001, 3010, 3012 and
> 3018 and since I had to split the boundary of Groot-Leuven, I went all
> around it to align it more on AGIV WMS imagery.

I fixed some of those boundaries and added some admin_level 9
boundaries for it too, but some are still broken.  Will try to
fix the rest tomorrow.


Kurt


___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] My first attempt at a boundary

[Kurt Roeckx]

On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 11:26:27PM +0100, Jo wrote:
> I haven't worked on boundaries before, but this discussion triggered it.
> 
> So I added boundary=postal_code relations for 3000, 3001, 3010, 3012 and
> 3018 and since I had to split the boundary of Groot-Leuven, I went all
> around it to align it more on AGIV WMS imagery.

I did some more changes, and did some other postal codes nearby.


Kurt


___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] My first attempt at a boundary

[Jo]

I haven't worked on boundaries before, but this discussion triggered it.

So I added boundary=postal_code relations for 3000, 3001, 3010, 3012 and
3018 and since I had to split the boundary of Groot-Leuven, I went all
around it to align it more on AGIV WMS imagery.

Cheers,

Polyglot


2013/12/4 Kurt Roeckx 

> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:04:10PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 01:49:56PM +0100, Marc Gemis wrote:
> > > Today, I did my first attempt add adding a boundary. The boundary is
> for
> > > the deelgemeente Muizen near Mechelen. The changeset is
> > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/19271107
> > >
> > > I used http://gisgeoloket.provant.be/ to export a jpg file of the
> boundary.
> > > I could not use the geo information that was generated by the file,
> > > probably due to a different projection. I then used JOSM + PicLayer
> plugin
> > > for positioning the exported jpg-file manually. Then I tried to trace
> the
> > > border.
> >
> > AGIV also has border information. It's easy to convert this to CSV
> > file you can import into josm.  Alternative there is also a WMS
> > layer with that avaialble.
> >
> > It's available under their public license and there shouldn't be a
> > problem using that.
>
> Buth muizen is of course part of Mechelen and so isn't available
> there.
>
>
> Kurt
>
>
> ___
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] osm.be!

[André Pirard]

On 2013-12-07 18:50, Gilbert Hersschens wrote :
> @ Ben: er staat nog een tikfoutje op het "Hergebruiken" tabblad:
> Cloudemade moet Cloudmade zijn.
>
> Gilbert
>
Congratulations for that site !!!
I have a few remarks too, but it's not appropriate to write them down
here for the posterity :-)
What about adding a Webmaster address?

Cheers,

André.


___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] osm.be!

[Glenn Plas]

Hi Ben,

Great work for a starter.  Some small tweaks to do : The NL/FR 
translation links only work on the 'Welkom' Page, not the others.


Tx for the efforts!

Glenn

On 07-12-13 12:35, Ben Abelshausen wrote:

Hi,

The osm.be  website is online!

Many many thanks to everyone who has helped, please report things that 
are wrong or things you wish to be changed to me or this list for a 
discussion. The website belongs to all of us.


If anyone wants to blog about their projects/mapping activities please 
let me know as well.


http://osm.be/

There are also two blog posts left in dutch, they can also be 
translated if required. I would do this myself but I'm still ashamed 
to say that google translate would to better job than me...


Met vriendelijke groeten,
Best regards,

Ben Abelshausen


___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

[OSM-talk-be] osm.be!

[Gilbert Hersschens]

Nog eentje: onderaan de blog pagina staat "Originele blogpost of
okfn.be(Engels):"
Dat moet natuurlijk "Originele blogpost van okfn.be (Engels):" zijn.
Overigens zou het leuk zijn als OpenStreetmap BE ook in het lijstje van
 werkgroepen zou staan op  de webstek van OFKN (http://okfn.be/about/)

Gilbert
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

[OSM-talk-be] osm.be!

[Gilbert Hersschens]

@ Ben: er staat nog een tikfoutje op het "Hergebruiken" tabblad: Cloudemade
moet Cloudmade zijn.

Gilbert
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] osm.be!

[Marc Gemis]

Thanks a lot to everybody who contributed in one way or another to "bring
the beast alive" :-)

m


On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Ben Abelshausen
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The osm.be website is online!
>
> Many many thanks to everyone who has helped, please report things that are
> wrong or things you wish to be changed to me or this list for a discussion.
> The website belongs to all of us.
>
> If anyone wants to blog about their projects/mapping activities please let
> me know as well.
>
> http://osm.be/
>
> There are also two blog posts left in dutch, they can also be translated
> if required. I would do this myself but I'm still ashamed to say that
> google translate would to better job than me...
>
> Met vriendelijke groeten,
> Best regards,
>
> Ben Abelshausen
>
> ___
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

[OSM-talk-be] osm.be!

[Ben Abelshausen]

Hi,

The osm.be website is online!

Many many thanks to everyone who has helped, please report things that are
wrong or things you wish to be changed to me or this list for a discussion.
The website belongs to all of us.

If anyone wants to blog about their projects/mapping activities please let
me know as well.

http://osm.be/

There are also two blog posts left in dutch, they can also be translated if
required. I would do this myself but I'm still ashamed to say that google
translate would to better job than me...

Met vriendelijke groeten,
Best regards,

Ben Abelshausen
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] I screwed up - update

[Marc Gemis]

I think I did all the needed reverts. The tiles are being rerendered at the
moment.
I'll keep an eye on it, but feel free to contact me in case you see
anything weird

have a nice weekend

regards

m

On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Marc Gemis  wrote:

> This morning I got the following message:
>
> Goedenavond
>
> Het is mij toevallig opgevallen dat u vandaag bij het creëren van enkele
> relaties (boundary postal_code) van Antwerpse gemeenten ook (allicht
> onbedoeld) verschillende grensnodes van andere gemeenten enkele kilometers
> hebt verplaatst. Het gaat meer bepaald om de gemeentegrenzen van Antwerpen 
> district
> Ekeren , Stabroek 
> Hoevenen
>  , Kapellen , 
> Brasschaat
>  enWuustwezel  (en de
> wegen die daarmee jammer genoeg ook knopen delen, vooral de N11
> (Kapelsesteenweg) en zijstraten. Zou u dit eens kunnen nakijken en indien
> mogelijk kunnen corrigeren/reverteren? Het gaat onder meer om de de (nodes
> van) wegen 29293555  , 
> 29262242
>  ,2923146  , 
> 86308084 en
> nog enkele andere in o.m. wijzigingensets 
> 19307695
>  , 19307773  ...
>
>
> This is caused by typing in a name of a relation in the josm editor panel.
> It sometimes executes a command then. I think a "Spiegelen" was executed on
> some relation.
>
> I know about the revert plugin in JOSM. I used it on the changeset. It
> generates 179 conflicts. I kept on clicking until they were all gone, but I
> ended up with a number of nodes without tags.
>
> I deleted that layer and tried to do a "Spiegelen" again, but can't find
> the right combination. I'm willing to look further into this, but I have
> some other obligations right now. So please don't edit in that area, or
> revert my stupidity.
>
> sorry !
>
> regards
>
> m
>
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be