Re: [OSM-talk-be] New UrbIS presets for Bruno and everybody
On 2015-11-26 10:07, Sander Deryckere wrote : > Do we really need these old URBIS urls? What use are they for regular > mappers (in contrast to people interested in recent history of a > region)? IMO they would clutter the list. Old versions of aerial photos are often very interesting when something is difficult to see on recent ones. An example that their users know very well is trees that are hiding the ground or not. Also, I was very impressed to discover the works over 6 years in Brussels. And they may be useful, for example to check that what's on the map is an old topology. But if the general opinion is to lessen chance to see better and not find older years exist, I will remove them. Don't forget (obviously) to tell which years you want removed. And install what you like before removal, those who like. André. ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] New UrbIS presets for Bruno and everybody
In fact they do clutter the list. Until yesterday I didn't even know those older versions existed and how to go about adding them though. There might be a solution: It is also possible to add these configurations through JOSM Remote Control. So for the people who want the older UrbIS and SPW imagery for comparison, we could create urls on a wiki page and/or a post on osm.be, invoking RC. What do you think? Jo 2015-11-26 10:07 GMT+01:00 Sander Deryckere : > Do we really need these old URBIS urls? What use are they for regular > mappers (in contrast to people interested in recent history of a region)? > IMO they would clutter the list. > > > Meanwhile, I also opened an issue to add the TMS layer to iD: > https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2846 > > Regards, > Sander > ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] New UrbIS presets for Bruno and everybody
Do we really need these old URBIS urls? What use are they for regular mappers (in contrast to people interested in recent history of a region)? IMO they would clutter the list. Meanwhile, I also opened an issue to add the TMS layer to iD: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2846 Regards, Sander ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
