Re: [OSM-talk-be] How to request arbitration?
Did you contact the owner of the airfield to find out how they name it ? Did you find a sign along the street pointing to the airfield with a name ? Is there a name sign at the entrance ? Is there an official document from a government which mentions a name ? If all of those questions return false, i.e. no name, then the airfield has no name. Maybe there are a few other places where we can look for the item of items, but making them up from ones armchair is certainly not one of them. No everybody gives their house, private tennis court, driveway or airfield a name. So noname=yes might be the only thing we can do. We should not make up names as "Airfield of Family Anderson", "Airfield near road N111" or whatever. Regards m. p.s. @Pieter, SomeoneElse, who participates in the changeset discussion is member of the DWG. On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 11:08 PM, Karel Adams wrote: > I am in a bitter dispute with a couple of mappers who absolutely refuse to > accept a "name=*" tag on an aerodrome because officially it has no name - > indeed it figures in no official document. > > My point of view is that an "invented" name - which can be discussed, of > course - is better than no name at all but they are quite adamant. How to > address this? > > For the details: see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57717417 and > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/573934869 > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names has been called in but I found > nothing there to indicate only official names should be mentioned. > > This seems really a case for arbitration, but how to request it? > > Karel > > > ___ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] How to request arbitration?
Hey Karel, This is the Belgian mailing list. Why send us, espacially about an aerodome in Denmark? Please ask the Data Working Group. We are not qualified for arbitration. Met vriendelijke groeten, Pieter Vander Vennet 2018-04-01 23:08 GMT+02:00 Karel Adams : > I am in a bitter dispute with a couple of mappers who absolutely refuse to > accept a "name=*" tag on an aerodrome because officially it has no name - > indeed it figures in no official document. > > My point of view is that an "invented" name - which can be discussed, of > course - is better than no name at all but they are quite adamant. How to > address this? > > For the details: see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57717417 > and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/573934869 > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names has been called in but I found > nothing there to indicate only *official* names should be mentioned. > > This seems really a case for arbitration, but how to request it? > > Karel > > ___ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
[OSM-talk-be] How to request arbitration?
I am in a bitter dispute with a couple of mappers who absolutely refuse to accept a "name=*" tag on an aerodrome because officially it has no name - indeed it figures in no official document. My point of view is that an "invented" name - which can be discussed, of course - is better than no name at all but they are quite adamant. How to address this? For the details: see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57717417 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/573934869 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names has been called in but I found nothing there to indicate only /official/ names should be mentioned. This seems really a case for arbitration, but how to request it? Karel ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
