Re: [talk-au] Admin levels for LGAs / suburbs etc changed (Was "Suburbs & admin boundaries stopping streets being found?)

2020-09-01 Thread Mike King
Hi Graeme

I’m not sure I can offer any advice on tagging but I’ve worked in land 
administration and can offer some general guidance on the hierarchy of land 
classification.  My knowledge is mostly Queensland based but I believe all of 
the states have a similar system given that ultimate authority over land is 
federal.  The nested hierarchy is simply Country>State>LGA>suburb (or 
locality)>parcel.  That is parcels comprise suburbs, suburbs comprise LGAs and 
LGAs comprise states so there is a complete coverage or fabric over the land 
and inshore areas.  The regions mentioned will most likely not have any admin 
status unless they are associated with an act of legislation (such as South 
East Queensland which now has defined boundary of the common participating 
councils).  There may be other areas such as Parishes or Counties which are 
still used in legal titles but these are largely no longer used for anything 
other than that due to the fact they were drawn up in an age which predates 
most modern systems and in a time where the local Church as something people 
recognised as a centre of an area.

Maybe someone working with cadastral fabrics in the states can provide more 
detail if required.

Kind Regards

Mike King
GIS Specialist
NHVR Solutions, Corporate Services
National Heavy Vehicle Regulator
P: 07 3309 8880 | E: mike.k...@nhvr.gov.au<mailto:mike.k...@nhvr.gov.au>
PO Box 492 | Fortitude Valley QLD 4006
Gasworks | Level 3, 76 Skyring Terrace| Newstead QLD 4006
www.nhvr.gov.au<http://www.nhvr.gov.au/>
[cid:image001.gif@01D3894F.ABA64A60]<https://www.facebook.com/NHVRegulator/> 
[cid:image002.png@01D3894F.ABA64A60] <https://twitter.com/nhvr>   
[cid:image003.gif@01D3894F.ABA64A60] 
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/national-heavy-vehicle-regulator>

From: Graeme Fitzpatrick [mailto:graemefi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 2 September 2020 10:38 AM
To: OSM-Au
Subject: [talk-au] Admin levels for LGAs / suburbs etc changed (Was "Suburbs & 
admin boundaries stopping streets being found?)

On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 18:39, Andrew Harvey 
mailto:andrew.harv...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 11:21, cleary mailto:o...@97k.com>> wrote:

I looked at the Wiki. It is quite a while since I looked at the section on 
administrative boundaries. My recollection is that it used to have LGA as 
admin_level=6 and suburb as level 9 or 10.  I do not recall any discussion of 
inclusion of regions, districts and townsites nor any previous discussion in 
regard to changing the level of LGA.   The wiki includes a link to a 
downloadable example which is headed "Australian Boundary Tagging _ OSM" but 
with copyright attributed to Government of Western Australia.  I am not sure 
how the current content of wiki was arrived at.  My memory is not perfect so 
perhaps someone can remind me how the wiki content on administrative boundaries 
and the WA Government copyright document was reached.

In NSW there are land districts defined in legislation with administrative 
boards etc so they could be included if we could get permission to use the 
source data (not included in current approval as far as I am aware) and there 
are probably equivalents in other jurisdictions. I think administrative 
boundaries must be sourced from government.   In NSW,  land districts are 
larger in area than local government areas (LGAs) but their influence and 
importance is (in my view) much less than LGAs - the Greater Sydney Local Land 
Services board has the majority of its membership appointed by the Minister for 
Agriculture and few Sydney residents would even know of its existence or role.  
I'd want to put them at level 11, certainly not a higher level than the LGAs.  
I do not think that a larger area automatically warrants a higher 
administrative level.

I am open to changing and developing our guidelines. However some boundaries 
are not necessarily administrative  e.g. Eyre Peninsula (natural region),  
Barossa Valley District (protected area), Illawarra Region, New England Region. 
 Some boundaries might be tourist labels or have local currency but would need 
to be mapped as something other than administrative.

Sorry I'm getting offtopic here...

I'm only familiar with NSW but for example we have a few non-administrative 
regions/districts mapped

Illawarra https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7876497 tagged as place=region 
without an admin_level
Northern Beaches https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7876483 tagged as 
place=district without an admin_level
Lower North Shore https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7876484 tagged as 
place=district without an admin_level
Upper North Shore https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11373192 tagged as 
place=district without an admin_level
St George https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7876480 tagged as 
place=district without an admin_level
others could be added like The Shire, South Coast, Hunter Valley, C

Re: [talk-au] Remote mapping of a fence

2020-02-12 Thread Mike King
Hi there

Queensland Governments open data is quite extensive.  I would discourage 
digitizing of this fence in favour of importing the actual data available from 
the Agriculture department

Metadata (read more at: 
http://qldspatial.information.qld.gov.au/catalogue/custom/viewMetadataDetails.page?uuid=%7B5E9EC7FB-99EE-4B2A-A43D-81FA0E44578D%7D
 )


Mike

-Original Message-
From: Warin [mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 13 February 2020 8:07 AM
To: talk-au
Subject: [talk-au] Remote mapping of a fence

Hi,


A remote mapper is adding a fence line to OSM.

I believe the imagery detail is not sufficient to map this fence alone.


See relation 10703889 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10703889).


I think the remote mapper is using the website https://www.ddmrb.org.au/
to establish where the fence is then using a very faint trace in imagery
to state there is a fence here.

Note https://www.ddmrb.org.au/copywrite/ - for private use only.


Thoughts?


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Warning: This email (which includes all attachments and linked documents) is 
intended for and is confidential to the addressee; it may also be subject to 
copyright, legal professional privilege or otherwise protected from disclosure. 
If you are not the addressee, or if you have received this email in error, you 
must not use, rely upon, disclose or reproduce it (or any part of it) in any 
way. Please notify the sender of your receipt of it and delete it in its 
entirety. The National Heavy Vehicle Regulator does not accept any liability 
for computer viruses, data corruption, delay, interference, interception, 
unauthorised access or amendment of this email.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au