Re: [OSM-talk-be] New traffic sign for bicycle

2017-03-26 Thread André Pirard 
On 2017-03-26 18:10, André Pirard wrote:
> On 2017-03-25 17:49, Marc Gemis wrote:
>> the problem with a subtag is that you cannot use it in combination
>> with oneway. Now you can map it as oneway:moped_A/B/P = yes
> Yes we can, as: :moped:A=yes
I meant  oneway:moped:A=yes  of course.
> When using namespace <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Namespace>,
> ":A" means a qualifier of what is before it, "moped", meaning which
> part of the mopeds we are talking about: "a moped of class A". And
> "moped:A" applies to "oneway", which part of the vehicles one-way is for.
> Unfortunately, as often with OSM docs, that article isn't very clear
> that namespace can be multilevel and in what order.
> The worst of it is that some contributors don't like namespace and
> scold those who speak about it, saying "we don't do like that" (who is
> "we"?).
>
> Cheers
>
> André.
>
>
>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Santens Seppe <seppe.sant...@stad.gent> 
>> wrote:
>>> Am I correct moped_A and moped_B are only used in Belgium? Can we have a 
>>> moped_P? Or would it be better to review the moped tag and make it 
>>> something like moped=yes + moped:A=yes + moped:P=yes?
>>> (by the way, a lot of new class A + P exception signs will be introduced in 
>>> the city of Ghent on 03/04/2017)
>>>
>>> Seppe
>>>
>>>
>>> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
>>> Van: Marc Gemis [mailto:marc.ge...@gmail.com]
>>> Verzonden: vrijdag 17 maart 2017 14:36
>>> Aan: Jakka; OpenStreetMap Belgium
>>> Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk-be] New traffic sign for bicycle
>>>
>>> How do we map the "P" category ? We already have moped_A and moped_B.
>>>
>>> m
>>>
>>> 2017-03-17 12:53 GMT+01:00 Jakka <vdmfrank...@gmail.com>:
>>>> Nouveaux panneaux de signalisation pour les deux-roues
>>>> http://www.code-de-la-route.be/textes-legaux/sections/ar/code-de-la-route/248-art65
>>>>
>>>> Nieuwe verkeers- onderborden voor tweewielers onder de aandacht brengen.
>>>> http://wegcode.be/wetteksten/secties/kb/wegcode/248-art65
>>>>
>
>
>
> ___
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] New traffic sign for bicycle

2017-03-26 Thread André Pirard 
On 2017-03-25 17:49, Marc Gemis wrote:
> the problem with a subtag is that you cannot use it in combination
> with oneway. Now you can map it as oneway:moped_A/B/P = yes
Yes we can, as: :moped:A=yes
When using namespace <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Namespace>,
":A" means a qualifier of what is before it, "moped", meaning which part
of the mopeds we are talking about "a moped of class A". And "moped:A"
applies to "oneway", which part of the vehicles one-way is for.
Unfortunately, as often with OSM docs, that article isn't very clear
that namespace can be multilevel and in what order.
The worst of it is that some contributors don't like namespace and scold
those who speak about it, saying "we don't do like that" (who is "we"?).

Cheers

André.






>
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Santens Seppe <seppe.sant...@stad.gent> 
> wrote:
>> Am I correct moped_A and moped_B are only used in Belgium? Can we have a 
>> moped_P? Or would it be better to review the moped tag and make it something 
>> like moped=yes + moped:A=yes + moped:P=yes?
>> (by the way, a lot of new class A + P exception signs will be introduced in 
>> the city of Ghent on 03/04/2017)
>>
>> Seppe
>>
>>
>> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
>> Van: Marc Gemis [mailto:marc.ge...@gmail.com]
>> Verzonden: vrijdag 17 maart 2017 14:36
>> Aan: Jakka; OpenStreetMap Belgium
>> Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk-be] New traffic sign for bicycle
>>
>> How do we map the "P" category ? We already have moped_A and moped_B.
>>
>> m
>>
>> 2017-03-17 12:53 GMT+01:00 Jakka <vdmfrank...@gmail.com>:
>>> Nouveaux panneaux de signalisation pour les deux-roues
>>> http://www.code-de-la-route.be/textes-legaux/sections/ar/code-de-la-route/248-art65
>>>
>>> Nieuwe verkeers- onderborden voor tweewielers onder de aandacht brengen.
>>> http://wegcode.be/wetteksten/secties/kb/wegcode/248-art65
>>>

___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] New traffic sign for bicycle

2017-03-25 Thread Marc Gemis 
the problem with a subtag is that you cannot use it in combination
with oneway. Now you can map it as oneway:moped_A/B/P = yes

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Santens Seppe <seppe.sant...@stad.gent> wrote:
> Am I correct moped_A and moped_B are only used in Belgium? Can we have a 
> moped_P? Or would it be better to review the moped tag and make it something 
> like moped=yes + moped:A=yes + moped:P=yes?
> (by the way, a lot of new class A + P exception signs will be introduced in 
> the city of Ghent on 03/04/2017)
>
> Seppe
>
>
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Marc Gemis [mailto:marc.ge...@gmail.com]
> Verzonden: vrijdag 17 maart 2017 14:36
> Aan: Jakka; OpenStreetMap Belgium
> Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk-be] New traffic sign for bicycle
>
> How do we map the "P" category ? We already have moped_A and moped_B.
>
> m
>
> 2017-03-17 12:53 GMT+01:00 Jakka <vdmfrank...@gmail.com>:
>> Nouveaux panneaux de signalisation pour les deux-roues
>> http://www.code-de-la-route.be/textes-legaux/sections/ar/code-de-la-route/248-art65
>>
>> Nieuwe verkeers- onderborden voor tweewielers onder de aandacht brengen.
>> http://wegcode.be/wetteksten/secties/kb/wegcode/248-art65
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
> ___
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
> ___
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] New traffic sign for bicycle

2017-03-21 Thread Santens Seppe 
Am I correct moped_A and moped_B are only used in Belgium? Can we have a 
moped_P? Or would it be better to review the moped tag and make it something 
like moped=yes + moped:A=yes + moped:P=yes?
(by the way, a lot of new class A + P exception signs will be introduced in the 
city of Ghent on 03/04/2017)

Seppe


-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Marc Gemis [mailto:marc.ge...@gmail.com] 
Verzonden: vrijdag 17 maart 2017 14:36
Aan: Jakka; OpenStreetMap Belgium
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk-be] New traffic sign for bicycle

How do we map the "P" category ? We already have moped_A and moped_B.

m

2017-03-17 12:53 GMT+01:00 Jakka <vdmfrank...@gmail.com>:
> Nouveaux panneaux de signalisation pour les deux-roues
> http://www.code-de-la-route.be/textes-legaux/sections/ar/code-de-la-route/248-art65
>
> Nieuwe verkeers- onderborden voor tweewielers onder de aandacht brengen.
> http://wegcode.be/wetteksten/secties/kb/wegcode/248-art65
>
>
> ___
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] New traffic sign for bicycle

2017-03-17 Thread Marc Gemis 
How do we map the "P" category ? We already have moped_A and moped_B.

m

2017-03-17 12:53 GMT+01:00 Jakka :
> Nouveaux panneaux de signalisation pour les deux-roues
> http://www.code-de-la-route.be/textes-legaux/sections/ar/code-de-la-route/248-art65
>
> Nieuwe verkeers- onderborden voor tweewielers onder de aandacht brengen.
> http://wegcode.be/wetteksten/secties/kb/wegcode/248-art65
>
>
> ___
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

[OSM-talk-be] New traffic sign for bicycle

2017-03-17 Thread Jakka 

Nouveaux panneaux de signalisation pour les deux-roues
http://www.code-de-la-route.be/textes-legaux/sections/ar/code-de-la-route/248-art65

Nieuwe verkeers- onderborden voor tweewielers onder de aandacht brengen.
http://wegcode.be/wetteksten/secties/kb/wegcode/248-art65


___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be