Re: [OSM-talk-be] Some numbers on address nodes within or on building
Also noticed who commented as a first ? I'm not surprised by this. It looks better too when the housenumber is nicely centered on the building way. tx for the headsup On 2013-10-25 07:41, Marc Gemis wrote: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lxbarth/diary/20261 I won't spoil the story by repeating the numbers here :-) m ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Some numbers on address nodes within or on building
Oh, that address relation should contain a node with the position where the housenumber should be displayed, of course (the whole comment was tongue in cheek, i.e. only half serious) Jo 2013/10/25 Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be Also noticed who commented as a first ? I'm not surprised by this. It looks better too when the housenumber is nicely centered on the building way. tx for the headsup On 2013-10-25 07:41, Marc Gemis wrote: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lxbarth/diary/20261 I won't spoil the story by repeating the numbers here :-) m ___ Talk-be mailing listTalk-be@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Some numbers on address nodes within or on building
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be wrote: Also noticed who commented as a first ? The comment wasn't there when I read it :-) m ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Some numbers on address nodes within or on building
On 2013-10-25 09:01, Jo wrote: Oh, that address relation should contain a node with the position where the housenumber should be displayed, of course (the whole comment was tongue in cheek, i.e. only half serious) Jo Oh, wasn't trying to discredit, its good you mentioned it there, I see more voices heading the way of using relations for complex addressing schemes. But I do think many people aren't as comfortable with relations vs. just putting addr:* tags on a node/way. Glenn ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Some numbers on address nodes within or on building
On 2013-10-25 08:55, Glenn Plas wrote : It looks better too when the housenumber is nicely centered on the building way. I also prefer, but ... generally. Not if some other writing tries to fight for the center room, not if there are several numbers for the same way, not if it's a corner house and you want to make it very apparent to which street it belongs, not if you want to indicate an unusual entrance position... There's a huge number of systematic node addresses in France. A matter of convenience. Sounds like discussing the sex of the angels. I would much more prefer GPS routes, n° 1 app, not sending cars or bicycles where they shouldn't go. Numbers are great: You arrived at your destination, facing the number, wherever it is. Cheers, André. tx for the headsup On 2013-10-25 07:41, Marc Gemis wrote: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lxbarth/diary/20261 I won't spoil the story by repeating the numbers here :-) m ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
[OSM-talk-be] Some numbers on address nodes within or on building
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lxbarth/diary/20261 I won't spoil the story by repeating the numbers here :-) m ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
