Re: [OSM-talk-be] way Diest - Geel
I think I was a little bit to fast. It is about http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=51.0466lon=5.0184zoom=13 The street is called Diestsebaan between Diest and Veerle-Laakdal. The way is also tagged as cycleway. Because I use josm the way was drawn as a cycleway. In the online editor everything looks correct. Is it not better to have a seperate way as lane for bikes ? If I am not mistaken the lane is seperated from the road by trees, but I am not sure there. kind regards, Bart Ben Laenen schreef: Bart Vanherck wrote: Hello, Someone did made a cycleway of the way between Diest and Geel. Is there a reason for that ? Which way do you mean exactly? I can't find anything wrong. Ben ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] way Diest - Geel
According to sattelite imagery, the cycleway is not separated ... It might be a JOSM bug do display it as a cycleway ... I'll check tonight on a similar road in my neighbourhood ... 2009/12/1 Bart Vanherck vanherck.b...@telenet.be I think I was a little bit to fast. It is about http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=51.0466lon=5.0184zoom=13 The street is called Diestsebaan between Diest and Veerle-Laakdal. The way is also tagged as cycleway. Because I use josm the way was drawn as a cycleway. In the online editor everything looks correct. Is it not better to have a seperate way as lane for bikes ? If I am not mistaken the lane is seperated from the road by trees, but I am not sure there. kind regards, Bart Ben Laenen schreef: Bart Vanherck wrote: Hello, Someone did made a cycleway of the way between Diest and Geel. Is there a reason for that ? Which way do you mean exactly? I can't find anything wrong. Ben ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] way Diest - Geel
I think I did. I think it serves no purpose, also, it was connected wrong on most of the junctions. After reading a bit, I found a page (from Ben?) that describes it not being a good idea do to so. I also think it should never ne drawn seperate, as, logically it's the same road, fysically it's just seperate built there for the purpose of it being a very dangerous road, and to provide some form of protection to cyclists. Tim I think I was a little bit to fast. It is about http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=51.0466lon=5.0184zoom=13 The street is called Diestsebaan between Diest and Veerle-Laakdal. The way is also tagged as cycleway. Because I use josm the way was drawn as a cycleway. In the online editor everything looks correct. Is it not better to have a seperate way as lane for bikes ? If I am not mistaken the lane is seperated from the road by trees, but I am not sure there. kind regards, Bart Ben Laenen schreef: Bart Vanherck wrote: Hello, Someone did made a cycleway of the way between Diest and Geel. Is there a reason for that ? Which way do you mean exactly? I can't find anything wrong. Ben ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be _ Windows 7: helpt je meer voor elkaar te krijgen. Ontdek Windows 7. http://windows.microsoft.com/windows-7___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
