James Ewen suggested to me off-list that it's possible these were originally Dshpak-style traced lakes. I opened up 055D04.0, and those outlines are definitely lakes. At some point, the lake tags got deleted and the border tags got added. I'm going to just go ahead and delete the current ways, and import Canvec for the area. Give it an hour or two and the area will be fixed.
Adam On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Samuel <samueld...@gmail.com> wrote: > Where did he get this data? It comes with a geobase uuid that partially > matches the actual border. It seems he was either hopelessly confused or he > knew exactly what he was doing. At this point I'm wondering if all his edits > should be removed from the map owing to inaccuracies and unknown sources. > > Sam > > On 10-09-25 08:21 PM, Adam Dunn wrote: > > To those who have been on this mailing list for a while, I'll point out > that these were added by vreimer in 2009. > > Adam > > On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Samuel <samueld...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> While where on data problems, what's up with these things on the MB-NU >> border ( >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=60.0183963775635&lon=-95.9642028808594&zoom=13 >> ). >> The source given is geobase. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-ca mailing list >> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >> > > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
