Re: [Talk-ca] Pay-and-display machines
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Richard Weait wrote: > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Gordon Dewis wrote: > > Ah... that looks like the right thing. Thanks! So, would the prepaid > cards > > you can buy from the City of Ottawa be considered > > payment:electronic_purses=yes? > > I'm not sure about that one. Aren't electronic purses / electronic > wallets useful at multiple vendors, and refillable? > > Perhaps account_cards? or add stored_value_cards or prepaid_cards? > payment:account_cards=yes > > Why are all of those values plurals? That seems weird. > I looked at the German example of the electronic_purses that is mentioned in the Wiki and it was a chipped card that stores cash. As far as I know, that's how the City of Ottawa cards work. I'm not sure if the City of Ottawa cards are restricted to being used for parking or if there are plans to expand them to be able to be used for other City of Ottawa services. I've added one of these devices (976335024) to Ottawa and specified it accepts coins, credit cards and electronic_purses. Annoyingly, they don't seem to be rendered in Mapnik or Osmarender. ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Re: [Talk-ca] Pay-and-display machines
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Gordon Dewis wrote: > Ah... that looks like the right thing. Thanks! So, would the prepaid cards > you can buy from the City of Ottawa be considered > payment:electronic_purses=yes? I'm not sure about that one. Aren't electronic purses / electronic wallets useful at multiple vendors, and refillable? Perhaps account_cards? or add stored_value_cards or prepaid_cards? payment:account_cards=yes Why are all of those values plurals? That seems weird. ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Re: [Talk-ca] Pay-and-display machines
Ah... that looks like the right thing. Thanks! So, would the prepaid cards you can buy from the City of Ottawa be considered * payment:electronic_purses=yes*? --G On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Richard Weait wrote: > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Gordon Dewis wrote: > > Hello... > > > > Ottawa started rolling out pay-and-display parking machines. Is this > > something that we might want to add to OSM? How should they be tagged? > > The vending machines would be amenity=vending > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vending > >* amenity=vending_machine >* vending=parking_tickets >* payment:coins=yes >* payment:notes=yes > ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Re: [Talk-ca] Pay-and-display machines
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Gordon Dewis wrote: > Hello... > > Ottawa started rolling out pay-and-display parking machines. Is this > something that we might want to add to OSM? How should they be tagged? The vending machines would be amenity=vending http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vending * amenity=vending_machine * vending=parking_tickets * payment:coins=yes * payment:notes=yes ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Re: [Talk-ca] Pay-and-display machines
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Approved_features/Parking We probably should differentiate between free parking and paid for parking. Amenity=? for the ticket dispenser? Cheerio John On 3 November 2010 21:05, Gordon Dewis wrote: > Hello... > > Ottawa started rolling out pay-and-display parking machines. Is this > something that we might want to add to OSM? How should they be tagged? > > Cheers! > > --G (aka Keeper of Maps) > > ___ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > > ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
[Talk-ca] Pay-and-display machines
Hello... Ottawa started rolling out pay-and-display parking machines. Is this something that we might want to add to OSM? How should they be tagged? Cheers! --G (aka Keeper of Maps) ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Re: [Talk-ca] Highway=trunk
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Olivier Hill wrote: > Hello all, > > Is this still accurate: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canadian_tagging_guidelines#Trunk That page looks like a mess to me, but I'm not interested in fixing it so I shouldn't complain. > According to this, pretty much everything in Quebec is tagged wrongly > with motorway. If it is limited access, dual carriageway, with grade separated interchanges and no direct access to properties (driveways), then it's a motorway. If there are some grade separated interchanges and some level crossings, then consider trunk. If there are driveways and direct access service roads, then primary is the highest classification possible. > Should this be fixed? I have changed part of the 50 Lachute to > Grenville, but it is not clear where it stops, where the 148 is used > and how it's linked to Montreal (via the 15?) ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
[Talk-ca] Highway=trunk
Hello all, Is this still accurate: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canadian_tagging_guidelines#Trunk According to this, pretty much everything in Quebec is tagged wrongly with motorway. Should this be fixed? I have changed part of the 50 Lachute to Grenville, but it is not clear where it stops, where the 148 is used and how it's linked to Montreal (via the 15?) Best, Olivier -- http://www.olivierhill.ca/ ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
