[Talk-ca] Cleaning up Manitoba and Saskatchewan

2012-04-11 Thread Andrew Allison
Hello:
Any thoughts on how to clean up Manitoba Saskatchewan from those red
shot gun blasts. Namely around Brandon, and Yorkton

Andrew


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] Quebec's Bermuda Triangle

2012-04-11 Thread Harald Kliems
Hi Frank:

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Frank Steggink  wrote:
> The triangle is probably caused by the shapefile which is used for rendering
> the coastline at levels 9 and below. This shapefile isn't updated very
> often. I believe it is a different one than the file used for levels 10 and
> above, which should be updated about once a week.
>
Thanks for the reply. The triangle has been around for at least a
couple of months. I suppose for the license change to be complete a
current coastline file will have to be used for generating the slippy
map, and thus the issue should go away soon. I'll keep an eye on it.

Best,
 Harald.


-- 
Please use encrypted communication whenever possible!
Key-ID: 0x199DC50F

___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] Coastline errors

2012-04-11 Thread Richard Weait
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Olivier Hill  wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 7:00 AM,   wrote:
>> From: Frank Steggink 
[ ... ]
>> The triangle is probably caused by the shapefile which is used for
>> rendering the coastline at levels 9 and below.
[ ... ]
> This is also what I'm thinking.
>
> I probably fixed the coastline near Ile Cadieux about 2-3 weeks ago,
[ ... ]
> Richard, is there a way to refresh the planet shapefile used at lower
> zoom? Can we bug someone?

We could bug somebody.  This sort of rendering problem appears on
occasion.  Asking about it on the #osm irc channel will usually
encourage the admins to update the coastline files.

There is a new effort to detect these potential errors so that they
can be removed.  Perhaps Paul can suggest how we can use his coastline
checker? Then we can fix other coastline issues and try to fix the
rendering for several of them at once?

___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] canvec and other external sources

2012-04-11 Thread Bégin , Daniel
Bonjour Richard,

I've modified my scripts to produce .osm files having the appropriate xml tag...
.

I'll introduce it in the Canvec.osm conversion process later today. Eventually, 
all of Canvec.osm files - Release 10 and later - will be processed that way.

Thanks to Paul

Best regards,
Daniel



-Original Message-
From: Richard Weait [mailto:rich...@weait.com] 
Sent: April 9, 2012 09:20
To: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: [Talk-ca] canvec and other external sources

Dear all,

Paul Norman pointed this out to me.

If canvec, or other external source data is created as an osm file, with


instead of the ordinary


that will protect a mapper who uses that data from a class of embarrassing 
accidents.  When using a canvec file for reference, a mapper might have several 
file layers open in JOSM.  Pressing upload with the wrong layer selected may 
upload data that was not intended or that duplicates existing data.  
upload="false" gives the mapper another chance to catch their error.  A 
dialogue box is presented before uploading a layer based on a file with 
upload="false".

To be clear, the data can still be uploaded.  Another warning is offered before 
the upload so that the mapper can double-check the action.

Do we agree that this would be an improvement to the CanVec data?
Daniel, would you consider making this change for future CanVec product?

Best regards,
Richard

___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] Talk-ca Digest, Vol 50, Issue 8

2012-04-11 Thread Olivier Hill
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 7:00 AM,   wrote:
> From: Frank Steggink 
> To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Quebec's Bermuda Triangle
>
> The triangle is probably caused by the shapefile which is used for
> rendering the coastline at levels 9 and below. This shapefile isn't
> updated very often. I believe it is a different one than the file used
> for levels 10 and above, which should be updated about once a week.
>
> Frank

This is also what I'm thinking.

I probably fixed the coastline near Ile Cadieux about 2-3 weeks ago,
which could explain the issue. I've been fixing a lot of coastlines
around Montreal and they tend to take about a month to show. I can't
imagine how much time it is going to take for this zoom level.

Richard, is there a way to refresh the planet shapefile used at lower
zoom? Can we bug someone? I guess this is the shoreline_300.shp file.

Thanks,
Olivier
-- 
http://www.olivierhill.ca/

___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca