Re: [Talk-ca] Annexation/amalgamation of towns/villages in Canada

2016-09-02 Thread Stewart C. Russell
On 2016-09-02 12:02 PM, yegbin wrote:
> 
> As Beverly no longer exists, is it best practice to delete this node or is 
> there a better way to tag it?

It shouldn't be in the map if it can't be verified on the ground.

As to tagging, please delete the gns:* tags and especially the is_in
tag. That last one's a dinosaur.

What do you hope to achieve by importing GNS place names? We have decent
place names available already. How will you avoid duplicates?

To avoid deletion, don't forget to follow the Import guidelines. As
we've recently seen on this list, they're not optional.

cheers,
 Stewart


___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] Annexation/amalgamation of towns/villages in Canada

2016-09-02 Thread James
You can use the disused tag

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:

If you really dont want to delete it

On Sep 2, 2016 12:03 PM, "yegbin"  wrote:

> Hi all.
>
> First post from a new contributor so initially want to say I am enjoying
> being a part of this OSM Canadian community.
>
> I would like some local opinions on Beverly.
>
>  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/51970574
>
> The former town of Beverly was amalgamated into Edmonton in 1961 (
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beverly,_Alberta). The area is now a number
> of named neighbourhoods (none of which are named Beverly).
>
> As Beverly no longer exists, is it best practice to delete this node or is
> there a better way to tag it?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> yegbin
> ___
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


[Talk-ca] Annexation/amalgamation of towns/villages in Canada

2016-09-02 Thread yegbin
Hi all.

First post from a new contributor so initially want to say I am enjoying being 
a part of this OSM Canadian community.

I would like some local opinions on Beverly.

 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/51970574

The former town of Beverly was amalgamated into Edmonton in 1961 
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beverly,_Alberta). The area is now a number of 
named neighbourhoods (none of which are named Beverly).

As Beverly no longer exists, is it best practice to delete this node or is 
there a better way to tag it?

Kind regards,

yegbin
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca