Re: [Talk-ca] Revert in Aylmer is complete
Looking at Bing images Rue Gérard-Binette certainly has houses built on it on the photo so I strongly suspect it is correctly labelled and has the correct house numbers on. Rue Jean-Louis-Morin is the same I think there are half dozen more in the same bit of Alymer. Cheerio John On 23 February 2011 12:13, Bégin, Daniel wrote: > Bonjour Jonathan, > > NRN (source of Canvec road network) was not supposed to contain any > "planned" street but I understand that some have been included accidentally > in Quebec. Field work might be necessary until the next NRN version is > available and included in Canvec product. > > Daniel > > -Original Message- > From: Jonathan Crowe [mailto:jonathan.cr...@gmail.com] > Sent: February 23, 2011 11:45 > To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Revert in Aylmer is complete > > Richard, thank you. The reversion is coming up in Mapnik now -- I didn't > have to check in an editor after all -- and things look back to normal as > far as I can tell. If there are glitches, they can't be very widespread. > > I notice that the addr:interpolation ways are still there, which all in all > I think is a good thing. They can be a little off in some of the newer > developments (e.g., around Wilfrid-Lavigne north of Allumettières); older > streets match up better with the addr:interpolation ways. And it's somewhat > ghostly to see them where there are no streets. These are things that can be > tweaked manually -- but still less work than we would otherwise have faced. > [1] > > I'm reluctant to trace in street ways between the ghost addr:interpolation > ways without confirming on the ground the existence of the street, in case > the imported data includes streets on the drawing boards that have not yet > been built (which I spotted in at least a couple of areas, unless the City > of Gatineau has been busy over the winter). I plan on surveying these > streets in the spring, unless someone else who lives closer beats me to it. > > [1] http://osm.org/go/cIhDQbn1M- > > Jonathan Crowe > The Map Room: A Weblog About Maps > http://www.maproomblog.com > > ___ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > > ___ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Re: [Talk-ca] Revert in Aylmer is complete
Bonjour Jonathan, NRN (source of Canvec road network) was not supposed to contain any "planned" street but I understand that some have been included accidentally in Quebec. Field work might be necessary until the next NRN version is available and included in Canvec product. Daniel -Original Message- From: Jonathan Crowe [mailto:jonathan.cr...@gmail.com] Sent: February 23, 2011 11:45 To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Revert in Aylmer is complete Richard, thank you. The reversion is coming up in Mapnik now -- I didn't have to check in an editor after all -- and things look back to normal as far as I can tell. If there are glitches, they can't be very widespread. I notice that the addr:interpolation ways are still there, which all in all I think is a good thing. They can be a little off in some of the newer developments (e.g., around Wilfrid-Lavigne north of Allumettières); older streets match up better with the addr:interpolation ways. And it's somewhat ghostly to see them where there are no streets. These are things that can be tweaked manually -- but still less work than we would otherwise have faced. [1] I'm reluctant to trace in street ways between the ghost addr:interpolation ways without confirming on the ground the existence of the street, in case the imported data includes streets on the drawing boards that have not yet been built (which I spotted in at least a couple of areas, unless the City of Gatineau has been busy over the winter). I plan on surveying these streets in the spring, unless someone else who lives closer beats me to it. [1] http://osm.org/go/cIhDQbn1M- Jonathan Crowe The Map Room: A Weblog About Maps http://www.maproomblog.com ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Re: [Talk-ca] Revert in Aylmer is complete
Richard, thank you. The reversion is coming up in Mapnik now -- I didn't have to check in an editor after all -- and things look back to normal as far as I can tell. If there are glitches, they can't be very widespread. I notice that the addr:interpolation ways are still there, which all in all I think is a good thing. They can be a little off in some of the newer developments (e.g., around Wilfrid-Lavigne north of Allumettières); older streets match up better with the addr:interpolation ways. And it's somewhat ghostly to see them where there are no streets. These are things that can be tweaked manually -- but still less work than we would otherwise have faced. [1] I'm reluctant to trace in street ways between the ghost addr:interpolation ways without confirming on the ground the existence of the street, in case the imported data includes streets on the drawing boards that have not yet been built (which I spotted in at least a couple of areas, unless the City of Gatineau has been busy over the winter). I plan on surveying these streets in the spring, unless someone else who lives closer beats me to it. [1] http://osm.org/go/cIhDQbn1M- Jonathan Crowe The Map Room: A Weblog About Maps http://www.maproomblog.com ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
[Talk-ca] Revert in Aylmer is complete
Thank you, woodpeck, for reverting a series of changesets in Aylmer at the request of talk-ca@. http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/woodpeck_repair/edits I suggest that you "add as friend" woodpeck_repair to show your appreciation. ;-) If you are familiar with Aylmer and surroundings, have a look and see if there any remaining loose-ends to revert. If so, let's keep track of the changeset numbers (perhaps in this thread) and we can have another go. Be sure to look with an editor, as tiles will be a bit scrambled while they refresh. Jonathan, does it look like it is back to where it was last week? Best regards, Richard ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
