Agreed with Paul,
The new version of Canvec (release 10) is compatible with the osm coastline
definition but still configured as multipolygon where the product is unaware
it is the ocean . For the moment, only BC and Northern part of Nunavut is
geometrically and correctly tagged.
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Paul Norman [mailto:penor...@mac.com]
Sent: April-14-12 22:09
To: 'Andrew Allison'; talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] coastline or water polygon
From: Andrew Allison [mailto:andrew.alli...@teksavvy.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2012 6:55 PM
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-ca] coastline or water polygon
Hello:
I'm removing red dots on the north coast of Nova Scotia at the
moment with canvec data. The canvec data has a bunch of polygons for the
coastline.
Is there any strong arguments which is better either
natural = coastline vs polygon of water?
Coastline = updates slowly, but smaller ways
water = updates faster but larger and less intuitive .
Andrew
The data in Nova Scotia in OSM is broken. Someone imported large
natural=water polygons on the coast over existing data. I fixed about half
of the imports and haven't had time to get back to the rest. The coastline
should *not* be mapped with natural=water.
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca