Re: [Talk-ca] Revert in Aylmer is complete

[Jonathan Crowe]

Richard, thank you. The reversion is coming up in Mapnik now -- I
didn't have to check in an editor after all -- and things look back to
normal as far as I can tell. If there are glitches, they can't be very
widespread.

I notice that the addr:interpolation ways are still there, which all
in all I think is a good thing. They can be a little off in some of
the newer developments (e.g., around Wilfrid-Lavigne north of
Allumettières); older streets match up better with the
addr:interpolation ways. And it's somewhat ghostly to see them where
there are no streets. These are things that can be tweaked manually --
but still less work than we would otherwise have faced. [1]

I'm reluctant to trace in street ways between the ghost
addr:interpolation ways without confirming on the ground the existence
of the street, in case the imported data includes streets on the
drawing boards that have not yet been built (which I spotted in at
least a couple of areas, unless the City of Gatineau has been busy
over the winter). I plan on surveying these streets in the spring,
unless someone else who lives closer beats me to it.

[1] http://osm.org/go/cIhDQbn1M-

Jonathan Crowe
The Map Room: A Weblog About Maps
http://www.maproomblog.com

___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Re: [Talk-ca] Revert in Aylmer is complete

[Bégin , Daniel]

Bonjour Jonathan,

NRN (source of Canvec road network) was not supposed to contain any planned 
street but I understand that some have been included accidentally in Quebec. 
Field work might be necessary until the next NRN version is available and 
included in Canvec product.

Daniel

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Crowe [mailto:jonathan.cr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: February 23, 2011 11:45
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Revert in Aylmer is complete

Richard, thank you. The reversion is coming up in Mapnik now -- I didn't have 
to check in an editor after all -- and things look back to normal as far as I 
can tell. If there are glitches, they can't be very widespread.

I notice that the addr:interpolation ways are still there, which all in all I 
think is a good thing. They can be a little off in some of the newer 
developments (e.g., around Wilfrid-Lavigne north of Allumettières); older 
streets match up better with the addr:interpolation ways. And it's somewhat 
ghostly to see them where there are no streets. These are things that can be 
tweaked manually -- but still less work than we would otherwise have faced. [1]

I'm reluctant to trace in street ways between the ghost addr:interpolation ways 
without confirming on the ground the existence of the street, in case the 
imported data includes streets on the drawing boards that have not yet been 
built (which I spotted in at least a couple of areas, unless the City of 
Gatineau has been busy over the winter). I plan on surveying these streets in 
the spring, unless someone else who lives closer beats me to it.

[1] http://osm.org/go/cIhDQbn1M-

Jonathan Crowe
The Map Room: A Weblog About Maps
http://www.maproomblog.com

___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca