Re: [Talk-GB] UK-specific tagging for rural feature names?

2009-06-21 Thread Nick Whitelegg
Hello Mike,

>I made one boo-boo:

>natural=moor should be place=moor as it is really an administrative 
designation.  The examples in the database are >place=moor.

>Mike

Isn't a moor a natural feature though, like a heath, etc? 

Nick



___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] UK-specific tagging for rural feature names?

2009-06-21 Thread Mike Collinson
At 01:53 PM 21/06/2009, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
>Hello Mike,
>
>>I made one boo-boo:
>
>>natural=moor should be place=moor as it is really an administrative 
>designation.  The examples in the database are >place=moor.
>
>>Mike
>
>Isn't a moor a natural feature though, like a heath, etc? 

That is what I thought when I started (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moorland) 
but it does not quite work when collecting local names as compared to 
identifying natural habitat.  My big thing is to collect all the often 
wonderful local names into OSM to help preserve usage.  I am easy though if 
other folks differ.

When I started checking all the "moors" around where I grew up I found that 
many look just like ordinary farmland and must have done so since about the 
eighteenth century.  The names in NPE appear to more accurately reflect 
assigned areas for each parish to graze their sheep rather than moorland per 
se. Rombalds Moor for example,  is made up of Ilkley Moor, a little unusual in 
being mostly for hunting rather than sheep farming, is definitely moorland, and 
then Baildon Moor, Hawksworth Moor, Addingham Moor, Steeton Moor, ... some of 
which are classic moorland and some grassy fields.

Also in the areas around Yorkshire cities, areas  can often be semi-built up 
but still keep the name such and such moor.


Mike 



___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb