Re: [Talk-GB] Kent Pharmacy, OSM Validation
Good idea trying to get clarification on the dataset terms and conditions. I have done further investigations. As I said, the national dataset has about 90% of pharmacies exactly located. But in the Kent data set does not include this precise data and instead has the postcode centre as the pharmacy position. IMHO, if we can get permission for the national level data set, we should import/merge the good 90% (and manually survey the remainder). If not, we can work on the inaccurate county level data and manually survey pharmacies as needed. In either case, the web site tool thing has a role. I now have OSTN02 transformation working, which is nice. I'll continue working on improving the usability of the site, and work towards a public release of the code "real soon now". :) It would be good to get several different data sets online and have a central registry of them (on the wiki). TimSC On 25/05/11 23:43, Andy Mabbett wrote: I've also reported the issue here: http://data.gov.uk/dataset/location_of_pharmacies#comment-5657 On 25 May 2011 23:31, TimSC wrote: On 25/05/11 23:25, Andy Mabbett wrote: Presumably you're using the data from the CSV, not the PDF? In any case the OG license is more recent, and thus supersedes the restrictive terms in the PDF. The web site says "Except where otherwise noted this is the Open Government Licence.". The data set does indeed say it has different conditions. I suspect this is an oversight by the website or they couldn't be bothered to update the PDF. I'll sleep on this one! Regards, Tim ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Help: Conflict not resolving in Potlatch 2
Thanks Andy. Lots of undoing did get me back to a point that I could save, so at least not everything was lost - just an hour or so... *sob* At least you got the bug fixed so some good came of it anyway. Right, now where was I Graham On Fri, 27 May 2011 14:07 +0100, "Andy Allan" wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Graham Stewart > wrote: > > > > Please excuse the slight off-topic, but I've spent the morning doing > > some Bing/OS_OpenData armchair mapping around Amble in Alnwick and > > Potlatch is refusing to save my changes. > > > > I get a message saying: > > > > "An item you edited has been changed by another mapper. > > Download their version and try again? > > (The server said: Version mismatch: Provided 1420, server had: 1421 > > of Relation 9579)" > > > > If I say "Yes" then I just get the same message again (and again and > > again...) until it eventually it gives up and says "HTTP error". > > > > Does anyone have a way out of this scenario or my work lost? > > I'd be happy to lose just my changes to members of that relation but > > keep everything else. > > > > I've tried pressing 'C' to close the changeset and starting a new one. > > (I've also noticed that if you confirm that dialog with the return key, > > rather than space, then it seems to report a new changeset ID anyway). > > From what I can see in the potlatch2 code, there appears to be a bug > in the code that downloads relations for conflict handling. > > The only thing I can suggest is to press undo until you get back > before the edit which changed the relation (national cycle route 1, in > this case). If it was towards the end of your session you might be > able to save some work. If anyone knows of any other "tricks" to get > around this I'd love to hear them! > > Meanwhile I've written a fix for the potlatch2 code[1]. Thanks for > your detailed explanation of what you were doing, it's made it very > easy to follow through the code and figure out what's going on. > > Cheers, > Andy > > [1] > https://github.com/gravitystorm/Potlatch2/commit/47a7aeb5c6d30b295cb92a09233118a2fe60fee5 > ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Help: Conflict not resolving in Potlatch 2
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Graham Stewart wrote: > > Please excuse the slight off-topic, but I've spent the morning doing > some Bing/OS_OpenData armchair mapping around Amble in Alnwick and > Potlatch is refusing to save my changes. > > I get a message saying: > > "An item you edited has been changed by another mapper. > Download their version and try again? > (The server said: Version mismatch: Provided 1420, server had: 1421 > of Relation 9579)" > > If I say "Yes" then I just get the same message again (and again and > again...) until it eventually it gives up and says "HTTP error". > > Does anyone have a way out of this scenario or my work lost? > I'd be happy to lose just my changes to members of that relation but > keep everything else. > > I've tried pressing 'C' to close the changeset and starting a new one. > (I've also noticed that if you confirm that dialog with the return key, > rather than space, then it seems to report a new changeset ID anyway). From what I can see in the potlatch2 code, there appears to be a bug in the code that downloads relations for conflict handling. The only thing I can suggest is to press undo until you get back before the edit which changed the relation (national cycle route 1, in this case). If it was towards the end of your session you might be able to save some work. If anyone knows of any other "tricks" to get around this I'd love to hear them! Meanwhile I've written a fix for the potlatch2 code[1]. Thanks for your detailed explanation of what you were doing, it's made it very easy to follow through the code and figure out what's going on. Cheers, Andy [1] https://github.com/gravitystorm/Potlatch2/commit/47a7aeb5c6d30b295cb92a09233118a2fe60fee5 ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-GB] cash bill pay services like paypoints
Hello GB OSMers, I think there are use-cases for tagging paypoint / payzone etc. availability. However the wiki is mute on this and tagwatch gives a grand total of one use for each. These tags aren't globally useful though. So should we just continue with the limited tag precedent or come up something more flexible / global? I thought I'd ask for a UK perspective before jumping into all the noise on the 'tagging' list. [I can see someone suggesting a wiki page be created; something I have avoided so far.] Joe e ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-GB] Help: Conflict not resolving in Potlatch 2
Please excuse the slight off-topic, but I've spent the morning doing some Bing/OS_OpenData armchair mapping around Amble in Alnwick and Potlatch is refusing to save my changes. I get a message saying: "An item you edited has been changed by another mapper. Download their version and try again? (The server said: Version mismatch: Provided 1420, server had: 1421 of Relation 9579)" If I say "Yes" then I just get the same message again (and again and again...) until it eventually it gives up and says "HTTP error". Does anyone have a way out of this scenario or my work lost? I'd be happy to lose just my changes to members of that relation but keep everything else. I've tried pressing 'C' to close the changeset and starting a new one. (I've also noticed that if you confirm that dialog with the return key, rather than space, then it seems to report a new changeset ID anyway). Thanks Graham ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
