[Talk-GB] Cycle routes - please document your relations!

2012-08-18 Thread Richard Fairhurst

Hi all,

There is a very useful wiki page:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_United_Kingdom_National_Cycle_Network/National_Routes

which documents ids for each route relation on the NCN.

Please use it! Before creating an NCN relation, check if one exists 
already; and after you've created one, please add the id to the table.


Otherwise we end up with the situation that routes get accidentally 
mapped with three or four separate relations, sometimes even on the same 
way. And yes, we should have an awesome search-by-tag function for 
relations in the API, but patches welcome etc.


cheers
Richard

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Cycle routes - please document your relations!

2012-08-18 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Graham Stewart wrote:
- Should ALL NCN route relations be in this table

Yes. I don't think we're at any risk of out-boggling Map Features quite yet.
;)

- Does the 1x, 2x, 3x etc numbering system still apply?

Yes. It's just that there's now also 1xx, 2xx, 3xx etc.

 The Sustrans numbering system has always seemed a little 
 broken to me. NCN10 is apparently Eastern despite being 
 a Coast to Coast route, and doesn't qualify as 7x. Scotland 
 and Northern England despite being further north than the 
 NCN72. Very odd.

AIUI that's because it was originally Regional Route 10. Re-signing it (last
year, I think) as NCN10, which hadn't been taken, was an expedient way of
getting rid of a Regional Route without causing much confusion. It's
certainly no more broken than the A-road numbering system where
out-of-zone roads such as the A14 etc. are now incredibly commonplace.

cheers
Richard





--
View this message in context: 
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Cycle-routes-please-document-your-relations-tp5721062p5721069.html
Sent from the Great Britain mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


[Talk-GB] Potential Vandalism - AGAIN

2012-08-18 Thread David Groom
islandmonkey seems to have been at it again

http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12772095

which just seems to consist of mass deletions, including deleted coastline, and 
no meaningful changeset comment

I also note 4 other changesets by him / her today

Can we get this reverted and block his account




David


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Potential Vandalism - AGAIN

2012-08-18 Thread Nick Whitelegg
+1 for blocking

Have contacted islandtoerag about silly edits in Southampton, no response.
Time to block this destructive yob.

Nick

-David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote: -
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
From: David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net
Date: 18/08/2012 06:31PM
Subject: [Talk-GB] Potential Vandalism - AGAIN

   
islandmonkey seems to have been at it  again 
  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12772095 
  
which just seems to consist of mass deletions,  including deleted coastline, 
and no meaningful changeset comment 
  
I also note 4 other changesets by him / her  today 
  
Can we get this reverted and block his  account 
  
  
  
  
David 
  
  
  ___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Potential Vandalism - AGAIN

2012-08-18 Thread Philip Barnes
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 20:37 +0100, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
 +1 for blocking
 
 Have contacted islandtoerag about silly edits in Southampton, no
 response.
 Time to block this destructive yob.
 
 Nick
+1 to blocking

He currently appears to be destroying the Long Island Expressway in New
York.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.7974414lon=-73.3417903zoom=18
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12776382

Maybe we should post to talk US?

Phil
 
 -David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote: -
 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
 From: David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net
 Date: 18/08/2012 06:31PM
 Subject: [Talk-GB] Potential Vandalism - AGAIN
 
 islandmonkey seems to have been at it again
  
 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12772095
  
 which just seems to consist of mass deletions, including
 deleted coastline, and no meaningful changeset comment
  
 I also note 4 other changesets by him / her today
  
 Can we get this reverted and block his account
  
  
  
  
 David
  
  
  
 ___
 Talk-GB mailing list
 Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
 ___
 Talk-GB mailing list
 Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb



___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Potential Vandalism - AGAIN

2012-08-18 Thread Philip Barnes
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 23:16 +0100, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
 
 On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 20:37 +0100, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
  +1 for blocking
  
  Have contacted islandtoerag about silly edits in Southampton, no
  response.
  Time to block this destructive yob.
  
  Nick
 +1 to blocking
 
 He currently appears to be destroying the Long Island Expressway in
 New
 York.
 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.7974414lon=-73.3417903zoom=18
 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12776382
 
 Maybe we should post to talk US?
 
 Phil
 
 Done.
 THOU SHALT NOT REVERT indeed - who is this pathetic little jerk? Has
 this sad loser really got nothing better to do than to f**k up other
 people's hard work? 
 
I am wondering who it is and why. THOU SHALT NOT REVERT confirms
he/she/it knows what they are doing. 

Anyone investigated the IP for Country/ISP/Institution? 

Phil



___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Potential Vandalism - AGAIN

2012-08-18 Thread Graham Stewart
 I am wondering who it is and why. THOU SHALT NOT REVERT confirms
 he/she/it knows what they are doing. 

Agreed. This one is called THE GENERAL SHALL NOT REVERT THEE
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12777187

Can we permanently block by IP?

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Potential Vandalism - AGAIN

2012-08-18 Thread Richard Fairhurst
David Groom wrote:
 Can we get this reverted and block his account

Dreedled.

cheers
Richard





--
View this message in context: 
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Potential-Vandalism-tp5720594p5721082.html
Sent from the Great Britain mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb