Richard Fairhurst <richard@...> writes: > > It's not so much a rendering bug, more a tagging discrepancy. The railway > stations in question are those tagged as > > railway=station; disused=yes > > There are those who say (and I can see their point) that this is a really > dumb way of tagging things. It's effectively saying "This is a railway > station; OH NO IT'S NOT". It means every single client using OSM data has to > know about "disused=yes" and add an extra processing rule. If you're writing > a Mapnik stylesheet, that's an extra condition on pretty much every single > rule - disused pubs, disused stations, disused roads, and so on. OSM tagging > doesn't, and shouldn't, usually work like that. > > So the better approach is to tag it differently.
Should we file a bug against the style sheet complaining that it encourages dubious tagging? -- Andrew _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb