Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

[John Aldridge]

On 10-Oct-16 20:26, Dan S wrote:

Really sorry for the stupid question, but: what is a participant in
this quarterly project actually supposed to *do*?


I asked a similar question a week or so ago. From the responses I got, I 
don't think there is a single shared vision of the goals of this project.


What /I'm/ doing is checking the Greg's map, and trying to make all the 
blobs round here go green :)


In most cases that involves filling in addr:postcode and fhrs:id on 
existing OSM features. I'm not, however, trusting that the postcode 
recorded on FHRS is accurate, and I'm not setting addr:postcode unless I 
can find corroborating information (e.g. the establishment's web site).


I'm definitely /not/ copying any other FHRS data into OSM tags. If 
people want to see the hygiene rating, they need to follow fhrs:id to 
the FHRS page, rather than looking at a stale OSM copy of that data 
which unlikely ever to be maintained.


Which reminds me... Greg's tool seems to have recently added two local 
churches (which don't in fact seem to have FHRS records at all), so I 
must wander over there to see if I can find a postcode on the 
noticeboards, since there doesn't seem to be one on either of their web 
sites!


--
Cheers,
John

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly project - taginfo tracker

[Greg]

These district statistics CSV files will now be copied each day to 
http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs-stats/ 
, so there will be a file per 
day in case anyone would like to track progress.

Thanks,
Greg


> On 9 Oct 2016, at 21:00, Greg  wrote:
> 
> The python-fhrs-osm tool will now create a CSV file containing statistics for 
> each district each day, which should allow detailed tracking. It will be 
> located at http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs/stats--mm-dd.csv 
>  once the tool 
> runs this evening.
> 
> Thanks,
> Greg
> 
> 
>> On 4 Oct 2016, at 17:58, Greg > > wrote:
>> 
>> In case it's useful for tracking, you can get the full list of tags used
>> by my comparison tool at the link below. The tool downloads nodes/ways
>> with those tags and any nodes/ways with an fhrs:id tag set.
>> 
>> https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/blob/master/filter-osm.sh#L5-L13
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Greg
>> 
>> 
>> On 02/10/16 17:38, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
>> 
>>> Off the top of my head, I'd have thought it would be good to know
>>> about number of instances of fhrs:id=* and addr:postcode=*, and
>>> numbers of eating type places (perhaps just one count for all
>>> amenity=cafe|restaurant|fast_food|pub|bar). Maybe also the
>>> number/proportion of such places that have a name tag. Possibly you
>>> could do other measures postcode progress, such as number of unique
>>> correctly-formatted postcodes in addr:postcode tags and/or number of
>>> postcode sectors ("AB12 X..") with at least one addr:postcode tagged.
>> 
>> ___
>> Talk-GB mailing list
>> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> 
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb