Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Perry Barr underpasses

[Andy Mabbett]

On 9 December 2016 at 19:19, Brian Prangle  wrote:

> Anyone passing Perry Barr want to take a look at the underpasses?  BCC tell
> me that they've all been replaced with signalised crossings

I've removed the "-1". I'll check whether the alignment has changed,
and if any new pelicans need to be added, next time I'm passing,
unless someone beats me to it.

-- 
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

___
Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands

[Talk-gb-westmidlands] Perry Barr underpasses

[Brian Prangle]

Hi everyone

Anyone passing Perry Barr want to take a look at the underpasses?  BCC tell
me that they've all been replaced with signalised crossings

Regards

Brian
___
Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands

Re: [Talk-GB] [OSM-talk] This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application:

[Michael Booth]

I don't think it's possible to delete an object in Maps.me. When you 
edit a place, after all the other details the option at the bottom is 
"place does not exist", which presumably leaves a note and comment.


With the complaints people have about Maps.me, just imagine how many 
more there would be if places could be deleted from within the app.


On 09/12/2016 12:54, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:

On 9 December 2016 at 11:49, Dave F  wrote:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Peter%20Mount/notes

They are all for the same entity.

How can we stop this annoying repetition? Can it be blocked at OSM's end,
contact individual users or, better still, get it blocked at source? Does
anyone have a contact at Map.me?

I wonder if this could be down to a simple misunderstanding of the
Map.me UI. As far as the user is concerned he's stated that an object
on the map no longer exists. He may not be aware this his action is
adding a note rather than deleting the object immediately. So when the
object stays on the map, he assumes his action has failed for
technical reasons, and so tries again.

Robert.




___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] [OSM-talk] This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application:

[Andy Townsend]

On 09/12/2016 12:54, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:


I wonder if this could be down to a simple misunderstanding of the
Map.me UI. As far as the user is concerned he's stated that an object
on the map no longer exists. He may not be aware this his action is
adding a note rather than deleting the object immediately. So when the
object stays on the map, he assumes his action has failed for
technical reasons, and so tries again.


Exactly that I think - feel free to pitch in on 
https://github.com/mapsme/omim/issues/4819 and related issues.


Cheers,

Andy


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] [OSM-talk] This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application:

[Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)]

On 9 December 2016 at 11:49, Dave F  wrote:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Peter%20Mount/notes
>
> They are all for the same entity.
>
> How can we stop this annoying repetition? Can it be blocked at OSM's end,
> contact individual users or, better still, get it blocked at source? Does
> anyone have a contact at Map.me?

I wonder if this could be down to a simple misunderstanding of the
Map.me UI. As far as the user is concerned he's stated that an object
on the map no longer exists. He may not be aware this his action is
adding a note rather than deleting the object immediately. So when the
object stays on the map, he assumes his action has failed for
technical reasons, and so tries again.

Robert.

-- 
Robert Whittaker

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb