Re: [Talk-GB] Layby restricted to abnormal loads
On 30-Mar-17 05:00 PM, David Woolley wrote: On 29/03/17 21:32, ael wrote: and, for good measure, hgv=permissive. Permissive sounds wrong to me. Permissive basically reflects the rights of the land owner, and for users is the same as yes. ___ And it has no banned other vehicles ...so motor_vehicle=no bicycle=no hgv=yes ? ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Layby restricted to abnormal loads
On 29/03/17 21:32, ael wrote: and, for good measure, hgv=permissive. Permissive sounds wrong to me. Permissive basically reflects the rights of the land owner, and for users is the same as yes. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-GB] Layby restricted to abnormal loads
I have just tagged a layby provided for abnormal loads (on the approach to a toll bridge) with highway=rest_area rest_area=abnormal_load and, for good measure, hgv=permissive. But I am not sure that conveys that only "abnormal loads" may park there. And a data consumer that has no knowledge of my invented rest_area value might direct other vehicles there. I think these restricted parking lanes are fairly common. I not very comfortable with using rest_area for laybys, anyway, but that seems to be the current recommendation on the wiki. Is there a better way? ael ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
