[Talk-GB] weeklyOSM #349 21/03/2017-27/03/2017

2017-03-30 Thread weeklyteam
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 349,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things 
happening in the openstreetmap world:

http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/8905/

Enjoy!

weeklyOSM? 
who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages 
where?: 
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Layby restricted to abnormal loads

2017-03-30 Thread ael
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 08:12:36AM +0100, Adam Snape wrote:
> As bicycles are vehicles (and not all other vehicles are motorised) that
> can be tagged as vehicle=no hgv=yes. Given that the exclusion likely
> includes more than just vehicles (eg. horses) , access=no foot=yes hgv=yes
> is maybe a better option.
> 
That sounds much better, although maybe there is a need for a new 
restriction tag.

ael


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Layby restricted to abnormal loads

2017-03-30 Thread ael
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:00:15AM +0100, David Woolley wrote:
> On 29/03/17 21:32, ael wrote:
> > and, for good measure, hgv=permissive.
> 
> Permissive sounds wrong to me.  Permissive basically reflects the rights of
> the land owner, and for users is the same as yes.

Well, yes, but looking down the list of values offered on the presets in
josm, that seemed the nearest. After all the landowner is giving
permission if there is an abnormal load.

We seem to be missing a restriction value for this sort of thing.

ael


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Layby restricted to abnormal loads

2017-03-30 Thread Adam Snape
As bicycles are vehicles (and not all other vehicles are motorised) that
can be tagged as vehicle=no hgv=yes. Given that the exclusion likely
includes more than just vehicles (eg. horses) , access=no foot=yes hgv=yes
is maybe a better option.

Adam

On 30 Mar 2017 7:29 a.m., "Warin" <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 30-Mar-17 05:00 PM, David Woolley wrote:
>
>> On 29/03/17 21:32, ael wrote:
>>
>>> and, for good measure, hgv=permissive.
>>>
>>
>> Permissive sounds wrong to me.  Permissive basically reflects the rights
>> of the land owner, and for users is the same as yes.
>>
>> ___
>>
>
> And it has no banned other vehicles ...so
>
> motor_vehicle=no
> bicycle=no
> hgv=yes
>
> ?
>
>
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb