Re: [Talk-GB] Overpass question: Fixmes and surroundings

[Rob Nickerson]

Hi all,

I found an answer to this in the end (mostly by chance). It seems like the
overpass in JOSM is different from what can be used on the Overpass Turbo
website. It JOSM you need to use the following instead:

[out:xml][timeout:90][bbox:{{bbox}}];
// Get all fixmes in current bounding box
(
  node["fixme"~"^(incomplete|stub|Longer than this|continue)$",i];
  node["FIXME"~"^(incomplete|stub|Longer than this|continue))$",i];
  way["fixme"~"^(incomplete|stub|Longer than this|continue)$",i];
  way["FIXME"~"^(incomplete|stub|Longer than this|continue))$",i];
)->.fixmes;

// find surrounds
(
  node(around.fixmes:50);
  way(around.fixmes:50);
  //relation(around.fixmes:50);
)->.surrounds;


// return results, fixmes and surrounds
(.fixmes; .surrounds;>;);
out meta;

*Rob*


On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 21:50, Rob Nickerson 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to craft a overpass query that returns fixmes and the
> surrounding OSM data. I seem to have got it working in Overpass Turbo. I
> want to use this in JOSM but it's not returning all the same Ways as seen
> in Overpass Turbo.
>
> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Myw
>
> Anyone able to help me please?
>
> Thank you.
> *Rob*
>
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Licensability of an employee's work

[David Woolley]

On 18/10/2019 17:43, Edward Bainton wrote:
*If an employee edits the map in the course of their employment, has the 
work been adequately licensed to OSM/the big wide Open?*




I think it is true worldwide that employers have the copyright in work 
for hire, and only they can licence the use of their copyright.  If the 
map is being edited at the employers request, the employer should create 
an OSM account for such purposes.


In the UK, if you day job is producing copyrighted maps, you will almost 
certainly find that anything you attempt to do on OSM comes under the 
employer's copyright.  California, in the USA, is a notable exception to 
this.



___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Licensability of an employee's work

[Edward Bainton]

Thanks, I'll repost.

On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 18:04, SK53  wrote:

> This really belongs on talk legal rather than talk-gb. The people
> qualified to answer such issues are more likely to be there, and it's
> rather specialised for this list.
>
> Certainly when I worked for a large company which paid a great deal of
> attention to such issues we would not have been able to claim to be agents
> of the company: although certain actions (signing another company's
> confidentiality agreement did have the result of being an agent: we were
> strongly warned against doing this).
>
> Jerry
>
>
>
> On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 17:45, Edward Bainton 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> Quick question arising from a 'lobbying' conversation:
>>
>> *If an employee edits the map in the course of their employment, has the
>> work been adequately licensed to OSM/the big wide Open?*
>>
>> According to Copyright Act 1988,
>> s. 11 (2) Where a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work [F1
>> ,
>> or a film,] is made by an employee in the course of his employment, his
>> employer is the first owner of any copyright in the work subject to any
>> agreement to the contrary.
>>
>> Can the employee be regarded, as far as OSM is concerned, as an agent of
>> their employer with authority to license the work?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Edward
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Talk-GB mailing list
>> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>>
>
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Licensability of an employee's work

[SK53]

This really belongs on talk legal rather than talk-gb. The people qualified
to answer such issues are more likely to be there, and it's rather
specialised for this list.

Certainly when I worked for a large company which paid a great deal of
attention to such issues we would not have been able to claim to be agents
of the company: although certain actions (signing another company's
confidentiality agreement did have the result of being an agent: we were
strongly warned against doing this).

Jerry



On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 17:45, Edward Bainton  wrote:

> Hi all
>
> Quick question arising from a 'lobbying' conversation:
>
> *If an employee edits the map in the course of their employment, has the
> work been adequately licensed to OSM/the big wide Open?*
>
> According to Copyright Act 1988,
> s. 11 (2) Where a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work [F1
> ,
> or a film,] is made by an employee in the course of his employment, his
> employer is the first owner of any copyright in the work subject to any
> agreement to the contrary.
>
> Can the employee be regarded, as far as OSM is concerned, as an agent of
> their employer with authority to license the work?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Edward
>
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] Licensability of an employee's work

[Edward Bainton]

Hi all

Quick question arising from a 'lobbying' conversation:

*If an employee edits the map in the course of their employment, has the
work been adequately licensed to OSM/the big wide Open?*

According to Copyright Act 1988,
s. 11 (2) Where a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work [F1
,
or a film,] is made by an employee in the course of his employment, his
employer is the first owner of any copyright in the work subject to any
agreement to the contrary.

Can the employee be regarded, as far as OSM is concerned, as an agent of
their employer with authority to license the work?

Thanks!

Edward
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb