Re: [Talk-GB] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database - matching against OSM
On 21/06/2020 13:38, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB wrote: Is it ok for pedestrians to walk on the carriageway and cross the road together with cyclists in place marked by bicycle paintings? It's legal for them to do so, which is what determines access. They don't get any priority. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-GB] weeklyOSM #517 2020-06-09-2020-06-15
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 517, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of a lot of things happening in the openstreetmap world: https://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/13289/ Enjoy! Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log in to https://osmbc.openstreetmap.de/login with your OSM account. Read more about how to write a post here: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/this-news-should-be-in-weeklyosm weeklyOSM? who: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages where?: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3 ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database - matching against OSM
21 Jun 2020, 12:07 by p...@trigpoint.me.uk: > On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 08:42 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB wrote: > >> >> >> >> Jun 21, 2020, 01:21 by list-osm-talk...@cyclestreets.net: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, 26 Apr 2020, Richard Fairhurst wrote: >>> You’ll remember that a couple of weeks ago I posted about the work I’m doing to look at getting the relevant bits of Transport for London’s openly licensed Cycle Infrastructure Database into OSM. https://github.com/cyclestreets/tflcid-conversion It takes the TfL CID files, compares them against OSM (by making queries against a freshly loaded Postgres database), and outputs a series of files for each datatype, all categorised by the type of editing that will be required to get them into OSM. >>> >>> You can now view this converted data as an interactive visualisation at: >>> >>> https://bikedata.cyclestreets.net/tflcid2osm/#13.12/51.50426/-0.08725 >>> >>> Use the "Feature type" drop-down to change the type. >>> >>> This shows the results of Richard's excellent scripting to convert the TfL >>> CID data to OSM tagging. It hopefully demonstrates the correctness of >>> Richard's conversion and the extensiveness of the data. I have also >>> included the two TfL photos of each asset. >>> >>> NB You can see the original TfL data using the "TfL CID" layer button, and >>> OSM data using "OSM" layer button. These are both in the main list of >>> cycling data layer buttons on the right-hand side. >>> >> https://bikedata.cyclestreets.net/tflcid2osm:type=crossings_junctions/#14.77/51.50656/-0.08864 >> is missing bicycle=yes foot=no intentional? See say >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/24923378>> (RWG082685) >> that seems impassable for pedestrians >> >> https://api.cyclestreets.net/v2/infrastructure.image?key=c047ed46f7b50b18&dataset=tflcid&id=RWG082685&version=1&variant=2&size=400 >> >> > Why? > > I cannot seen anything prohibiting pedestrians at that point. > > Phil (trigpoint) > Is it ok for pedestrians to walk on the carriageway and cross the road together with cyclists in place marked by bicycle paintings?___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database - matching against OSM
On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 08:42 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB wrote: > > > Jun 21, 2020, 01:21 by list-osm-talk...@cyclestreets.net: > > On Sun, 26 Apr 2020, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > > > You’ll remember that a couple of weeks ago I posted about the > > > work I’m doing to look at getting the relevant bits of Transport > > > for London’s openly licensed Cycle Infrastructure Database into > > > OSM. > > > > > > https://github.com/cyclestreets/tflcid-conversion > > > > > > It takes the TfL CID files, compares them against OSM (by making > > > queries against a freshly loaded Postgres database), and outputs > > > a series of files for each datatype, all categorised by the type > > > of editing that will be required to get them into OSM. > > > > You can now view this converted data as an interactive > > visualisation at: > > > > https://bikedata.cyclestreets.net/tflcid2osm/#13.12/51.50426/-0.08725 > > > > Use the "Feature type" drop-down to change the type. > > > > This shows the results of Richard's excellent scripting to convert > > the TfL CID data to OSM tagging. It hopefully demonstrates the > > correctness of Richard's conversion and the extensiveness of the > > data. I have also included the two TfL photos of each asset. > > > > NB You can see the original TfL data using the "TfL CID" layer > > button, and OSM data using "OSM" layer button. These are both in > > the main list of cycling data layer buttons on the right-hand side. > https://bikedata.cyclestreets.net/tflcid2osm:type=crossings_junctions/#14.77/51.50656/-0.08864 > is missing bicycle=yes foot=no intentional? See say > https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/24923378 (RWG082685) > that seems impassable for pedestrians > > https://api.cyclestreets.net/v2/infrastructure.image?key=c047ed46f7b50b18&dataset=tflcid&id=RWG082685&version=1&variant=2&size=400 > Why? I cannot seen anything prohibiting pedestrians at that point. Phil (trigpoint) ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database - matching against OSM
On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 at 00:29, Martin - CycleStreets wrote: > Speed bumps: > https://bikedata.cyclestreets.net/tflcid2osm:type=bumps_road/#14.98/51.47101/-0.02755 There isn't a "bumps_new" filter at present, so it is hard to see what is to be added. I've already added a lot of traffic calming in my area, so would want to see what is to be changed. In general, the work here is amazing, although I can definitely see a few issues/mismatches. Stephen ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
