Re: [Talk-GB] Street-name toids

[Steve Doerr]

On 13/08/2020 13:06, SK53 wrote:
This location 
 on Robert's 
site shows several UPRNs on streets:


  * 10009154384 on Averton Square



That's a link to openstreetmap.org, not to something called 'Robert's site'.

--

Steve



--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] National Cycle Network removal/reclassification

[Simon Still]

> On 14 Aug 2020, at 20:44, David Woolley  wrote:
> 
> On 14/08/2020 19:14, Simon Still wrote:
>> I’m not sure that’s actually a legal status that changes anything - 
>> pedestrians have priority on all shared use paths so not sure that tag would 
>> add anything
> 
> Towpaths are privately paths (currently owned by the Canals and Rivers 
> Trust), so the rules for public paths don't apply.  At one time  you had to 
> apply for a free licence to cycle on them, the quid for quo for which was a 
> promise to do things like give pedestrians priority.

True, but there are also ‘pedestrian priority’ signs in parks and on other bits 
of shared path.  No one has ever been stopped by the police for ‘failing to 
give pedestrian priority’ - it would be reckless cycling or something similar. 

I’m just struggling to think what the tag would add - either for information or 
for a routing algorithm.  Also note the the proposals for the highway code 
would establish and road user hierarchy which would apply everywhere 
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb