Re: [Talk-GB] "Survey Me" Tool Update
On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 02:21:43PM +, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: > On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 at 13:02, ael via Talk-GB > wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 12:11:42PM +, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) > > wrote: > > > For anyone who's interested, I've just updated my "Survey Me" tool at > > > https://osm.mathmos.net/survey/ . > > > > I took a look and it flagged up > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3149722064 > > as having no name. But it has a perfectly good name? > > It's not flagging https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3149722064 , it's > flagging the building next to it: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679205532 . That building is tagged > with shop=yes but no has name=* tag. When an issue concerns an > existing OSM object, you'll find a direct link to that object in the > popup bubble when you click/tap on the icon. I thought that I tried that. I clicked on the edit, and that didn't works as I recall. I just tried again and now realize that the "shop=yes" is also a link, and indeed that worked. > > In this case see: https://osm.mathmos.net/survey/#19/51.7885/-1.4833 . > If the building is only that single shop, then you could remove the > shop node and transfer the tags to the building way. If the building > also has other uses (e.g. there's a flat above the shop, or it > contains more than one shop) then it might be better to remove the > shop=yes tag from the building, and move the shop node inside the > bounds of the building instead. A later mapper added the tag to the building without moving the shop node, and duplicating the shop tag hence this problem. I will update. ael ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] "Survey Me" Tool Update
Thanks for this tool. Very useful -- Securely sent with Tutanota. Get your own encrypted, ad-free mailbox: https://tutanota.com 7 Nov 2020, 12:11 by robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com: > For anyone who's interested, I've just updated my "Survey Me" tool at > https://osm.mathmos.net/survey/ . It now includes food retail chains > where OSM mapping doesn't agree with the "Retail Points" dataset from > Geolytix ( https://blog.geolytix.net/tag/retail-points/ ). > > The idea of "Survey Me" is that it flags up potential errors or > omissions in OSM data that probably require a ground survey to > resolve. So mappers may like to have a look at their local area, or > anywhere they are visiting, to see if there's anything worth checking > out. > > More details of the comparison between OSM data and Retail Points can > be found at https://osm.mathmos.net/chains/ . > > Robert. > > -- > Robert Whittaker > > ___ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] "Survey Me" Tool Update
On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 at 13:02, ael via Talk-GB wrote: > On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 12:11:42PM +, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: > > For anyone who's interested, I've just updated my "Survey Me" tool at > > https://osm.mathmos.net/survey/ . > > I took a look and it flagged up > https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3149722064 > as having no name. But it has a perfectly good name? It's not flagging https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3149722064 , it's flagging the building next to it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679205532 . That building is tagged with shop=yes but no has name=* tag. When an issue concerns an existing OSM object, you'll find a direct link to that object in the popup bubble when you click/tap on the icon. In this case see: https://osm.mathmos.net/survey/#19/51.7885/-1.4833 . If the building is only that single shop, then you could remove the shop node and transfer the tags to the building way. If the building also has other uses (e.g. there's a flat above the shop, or it contains more than one shop) then it might be better to remove the shop=yes tag from the building, and move the shop node inside the bounds of the building instead. Robert. -- Robert Whittaker ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] "Survey Me" Tool Update
On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 12:11:42PM +, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: > For anyone who's interested, I've just updated my "Survey Me" tool at > https://osm.mathmos.net/survey/ . It now includes food retail chains > where OSM mapping doesn't agree with the "Retail Points" dataset from > Geolytix ( https://blog.geolytix.net/tag/retail-points/ ). I took a look and it flagged up https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3149722064 as having no name. But it has a perfectly good name? ael ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-GB] "Survey Me" Tool Update
For anyone who's interested, I've just updated my "Survey Me" tool at https://osm.mathmos.net/survey/ . It now includes food retail chains where OSM mapping doesn't agree with the "Retail Points" dataset from Geolytix ( https://blog.geolytix.net/tag/retail-points/ ). The idea of "Survey Me" is that it flags up potential errors or omissions in OSM data that probably require a ground survey to resolve. So mappers may like to have a look at their local area, or anywhere they are visiting, to see if there's anything worth checking out. More details of the comparison between OSM data and Retail Points can be found at https://osm.mathmos.net/chains/ . Robert. -- Robert Whittaker ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
