Re: [Talk-GB] maxspeed field - what units should we use. etc

2009-06-04 Thread Douglas Furlong
2009/6/4 WessexMario 

> I propose that we adopt a new key:  maxspeed_mph
>

If we have maxspeed_mph, I would be far happier seeing.

maxspeed:mph
maxspeed:km/h

I don't like the idea of maxspeed and maxspeed_mph, we'll almost certainly
find things defaulting to maxspeed, when it should be maxspeed_mph.

I think having those two options makes more sense than having maxspeed
defaulting to km/h unless mph (or some thing similar) is entered.

Then in things like Josm, it can have two options for entering the speed, or
a radio button or or or.

As soon as the tag is explicitly one thing or another, the user will no
longer be inclined to convert from one thing or another.

The only down side I see, is that all of the applications that currently
work with maxspeed, would need to be updated.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] maxspeed field - what units should we use. etc

2009-06-04 Thread Douglas Furlong
2009/6/4 WessexMario 

>
> > you only need 5dp to get an exact mph->kph conversion anyway :-)
>
> I think that's the big issue.
>
> People won't be able to agree on whether we should enter 0, 2,3 or 5
> decimal
> places,


Personally I think it should be to 1 decimal place ;)
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Isle of Wight 2

2009-06-01 Thread Douglas Furlong
If the dates are suitable I'm in.

2009/6/1 Peter Childs 

> 2009/6/1 SteveC :
> > I'm tempted, but half the point is that we need to stop thinking that
> > the IoW is mapped, without addresses or turn restrictions there's a
> > long way to go.
> >
> > On 1 Jun 2009, at 10:53, Steve Chilton wrote:
> >
> >> Steve
> >>
> >> I would be very interested.
> >> Would you consider pitching at somewhere "less mapped".
> >> Parts of Devon/Cornwall spring to mind.
> >>
>
> Mapping is NEVER finished, You can always fill in more gaps make some
> updates etc etc. I think the point is that some places need more work
> than others,  Is it better to map everywhere a bit or a few places
> perfectly?
>
> Peter
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Sat Navs to stop working?

2009-05-21 Thread Douglas Furlong
My father phoned me last night to discuss it.

I've not listened to the show, however my understanding is that, they
satellites are gradually reducing in orbit and as such will eventually drop
on our heads, as opposed to letting us know where we are.

Apparently the US Military have not spent any money putting new ones up,
hence the problem.

Some how though, I really do doubt that it would all just stop working, the
US I would have thought would need to have their own system, and I doubt
they would like loosing all the money that the GPS system brings in.


2009/5/21 Russ Phillips 

> Yesterday, on Radio 2's drive time show, someone mentioned that sat
> navs would stop working next year. My wife heard it as she was driving
> home, but there were no details.
>
> We can't work out what they were talking about. The Listen Again page is
> here:
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00kg9fr
>
> I can't listen to it because I'm at work, but I can't find any mention
> of it on the BBC news pages. Does anyone know what they were talking
> about?
>
> Russ
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb